phoshi-old
Phoshi
phoshi-old

@Dr.Jeckyl: sometimes they don't, it seems. I just keep setting them and eventually they stick around.

@soggy_cheerio: That makes sense. Mine just does at specified times (Or on script startup), at the moment. Still, it's functioned well so far, everything from keeping an IRC bot running to starting uTorrent when my ISP stops throttling bittorrent traffic (Or as soon as I can, for Lost :P)

WOOO! Ready to friday!

@johnsmith1234: Hey, we have lasers and space ships - but they're not mainstream enough to not be sci-fi.

@geneh001: It seems to get better battery life, while doing more, which is important. It was designed with netbooks in mind, so things are a bit more jiggered towards them where it counts (Unlike XP, where the concept of a laptop, nevermind a netbook, was a bit racy), it is indeed prettier, the new taskbar is, IMO,

@MacAttack7388: If by better specs, you mean the (Ancient!) ones XP was designed for, yes. Even a netbook has better specs than that, and windows 7 can take advantage of those. XP is [i]ancient[/i]. 8 years ago, a dual core processor was something you'd hear in sci-fi. Measuring RAM in the GB only happened if it was

@soggy_cheerio: I hadn't thought about firebug, but that should be handy. Thanks :)

@soggy_cheerio: ooh, getting comments could be neat. I'll have to take a fine comb through LH's JS, see if I can't figure it out :)

@soggy_cheerio: I'm really not that hot on AJAX, though :(

@soggy_cheerio: I'm really not that hot on AJAX, I get far too caught up in the visual aspect of web design :(

@NorwoodIsMyHero: I might complain about gawker (changing font to type for no apparent reason? Arg!), but I sure couldn't write LH :P

@TheFu: Oh, they are for me too. Normally.

@TheFu: Script actually picked up your comment as I was reading it, so just 3 minutes late!

@TheFu: Trying to maintain it even in it's current pre-pre-alpha form simply makes me hate gawker. When I first wrote it, scraping one's user page was significantly faster than the ajax calls (Even now they have a bit of lag), and I used a few of the CSS classes to extract the urls. A few weeks ago, they changed the

@nachobel: I'd hope so, though it might be too "flickery" to work. It'd be great if it did, though.

@nachobel: There's no reasonable limit to how quickly a gif can animate, only filesize and bandwidth constraints.