So, if feminists really are appalled by all the bad things that are happening to men, supposedly as a result of Patriarchy, what, exactly, are they doing about it? What about the problem of domestic violence against men? Sure, you could assert that men are being hurt by the Patriarchy here, since it's somehow…

What about when feminists try to shut me up or shame me by calling me a "rapist"? How is that a result of Patriarchy?

Simple solution—just speak up directly to the guys themselves. If your first instinct is to passive-aggressively shame somebody who does something you don't like, then you need to be put into court-mandated therapy because frankly, you're a psychopath.

Can't wait for the next installment, which will no doubt be titled "Fuck you, Science!"

Mighty hypocritical of y'all to publish this on the same site where an article is published criticizing MRAs for publicizing the remarks of women who admitted to destroying private property, blocking people from hearing Warren Farrell speak, and rejoicing in the fact that men and boys' suicide rates are climbing.

I've been wondering for quite a while: Why have feminists been attacking Nice Guys so much?

The term you're probably looking for is "ad hominem". And no, this doesn't qualify. I didn't personally attack Kate Harding or the author of that other article. And I fail to see how what I posted is "totally unrelated". Both are talking about acts of bigotry, and people getting publicly exposed for their remarks.…

MRAs deserve a "fuck you" for exposing little bigots and their violently anti-male remarks, even though all the people they exposed are legally old enough to vote, marry, own property, and sign contracts, and therefore old enough to own their shit?

Ponnuru has responded to this. Basically, he called you out for devoting five-sixths of your column to name calling, and the rest pointing out how the studies you cite don't back up your claims. Look for it. It's called "A Feminist Needs Accurate Statistics Like a Fish Needs a Bicycle". It's in the National Review…

some kind of "private message board where users are vetted but anonymous, where women can take this knowledge about who belongs on The Island and share it without fear of retribution."

Of course it's wrong to call her a hero. Heroes don't punch people in the face for saying something they don't like. That's what bullies do.

Yes. Sorry to shatter your world perceptions, but attempting to get myself snipped got me labeled a "Self-centered, irresponsible douchebag". Never mind that I've been diagnosed with autism and have a family history of alcoholism and depression.

First off, the study does not say "all women". You are inferring that purely from your own biases, which is extremely disreputable as far as journalism tactics go. Secondly, you are refuting this with anecdotal evidence, and with statistics that don't even refute it at all (37% of NBA fans are women? How does that…