That is the dumbest legal definition of assault. Sounds tailor-made for abusive spouses, who as we all know tend to be experts in causing invisible bodily injury.

They should book her for Fyre Festival 2018.

If you look again at the receipt that $1900 already includes a 20% auto tip on their $1600 meal ($321) so they added another $100 which brings it to a lil over 26%. Not as bad as of a tip, though with their money they should be tipping 30%. I’m broke and tip 20-25% (also work in the industry)

She always looks like she is a cast-off character in the Star Wars prequels.

You must not have hired the three recruiters.

1) definitely could not see this with just eyeballs

She was sunbathing topless behind a private residence, on privately-owned land, and photographed with a long-lens camera from quite a distance away. She wasn’t in public.

Except this wasn’t in public. She was sunbathing on private property, and they used a long-range lens to get the picture.

She wasn’t in public, though. That’s pretty relevant.

It’s weird how when a bloke with a long-lensed camera creeps around in the bushes taking photos of topless women without their consent or even their knowledge, it’s fine if the woman is famous, but if the woman isn’t famous, the bloke is actually a creepy stalking pervert.

How about not looking a photos of women that they have not consented to have taken? Cool.

If you need a telephoto lens to see someone’s nipples, you shouldn’t be looking at those nipples.

Dr. Sara Josephine Baker, who basically single handedly started preventative OB and child care in New York city, said the same thing:

I have always wondered how makeup companies got away with that. It is SO obvious that the lash are fake. Show me what the mascara can REALLY do and I’ll buy it. For now, I’ll stick with my Maybelline Great Lash in the pink and green tube.

We are undoubtedly going to get a lot of people making false equivalencies between male circumcision and FGM. I am not in favor of circumcision by any means, but they are radically different procedures and it helps no one to treat them as equally damaging. They are not. FGM is basically the equivalent of removing both…

Some doctors who perform FGM rationalize it because a doctor can do it under sterile conditions. It’s a shitty rationalization.

Because it’s not mutilation. That’s the difference.

“We cannot dismiss the agency of these women in their compliance with their cultural practices.”

Actually, it would allow women who decide to partake in such endeavors, to go to the police when they have been assaulted, etc. 1 small part of many, that would make it safer to do so.

Sweet Jeebus, could you imagine if the NFL encouraged fans to report infractions as they were happening on the field, and then those infractions would be enforced? Holy shitballs, that would be a cosmic clusterfuck. But...I kind of also want to see it.