peterj4--disqus
Peter J4
peterj4--disqus

I took it more as kindred spirits happy and surprised to find someone else on their wavelength, but I like that Lynch left it open-ended. I'm just sad we'll never get to see more of them.

I'm surprised at the CW that this episode was the weakest as for me episodes 5 and 6, while full of decent moments and performances, were much more flawed (I found Candy Clark showing up to hector Truman over and over to be unbearable, although it made sense when we learned why…I also thought the stuff with Red and

I don't think it was the worst, but I do think it was sort of like putting expensive cream on a cheap cake. It just felt pretentious and empty - some scenes like the cops looking for James made me laugh out loud. Maybe that was the intent, I don't know. But I promise my dislike for it isn't based on Diane Keaton

I felt for Bobby even on the show (especially in the first season) but the diary did a lot to flesh him out. The diary entry where Laura talked about her first time with Bobby and he told her how special it was and that he loved her, and she laughed and laughed at him - it's just so devastating to read because you can

This is one of the only comments sections that I look forward to reading for this show (or message board or blog) as it's generally pretty well-balanced with criticism and praise, rather than fan wars or endless pouting and anger because Lynch isn't giving them what they want, yet people who are unhappy with elements

It tends to be thrown around when critics talk about "the golden age of television" so I conflate the two. Fair point though.

I loved the smoking scene with Gordon, Tammy and Diane. It slowly moved from an extremely awkward silent conversation with extremely awkward people to what felt like something from a teenage love triangle, as Gordon gave into nicotine temptation over Tammy's objections. The oddest part is that 70-year old David Lynch

I was distant early on - honestly I wasn't even sure I was going to watch because I don't bother with a lot of TV now and I also thought I got most of what I needed from the show already - but more and more I've been caught up in it and have the same feelings you do. It's tough to explain. The show has its flaws but

I wouldn't either. For me the worst was the one with Lana Milford as the temptress of the menfolk. It was everything I never wanted Twin Peaks to be, which is something that had the stench of a bad Northern Exposure or Picket Fences episode.

Absolutely.

Yeah it's a dick move but I just can't pity the guy after what he said about Frank's son. I should probably be annoyed at Lynch for making such a one-dimensional character, but then he usually does have at least one or two roaming around for us to really enjoy hating (Leo and Hank Jennings were the main two in the

In the Secret History he says that he knows he let Bobby down because he was barely there for him as he grew up (he was too busy studying and documenting). I'd like to believe as he attained more of place on the plane he was shown Bobby's future.

The foot talking to him seems to be the counterpart to the arm.

The last name.

Yes that scene on the plane got to me, because I saw the intent - showing us the innocence of these broken people - and then I remembered.

There's no such thing as Peak TV. It's a term critics throw around to feel important. Some shows are good. Some are alright. Some are bad. To me Twin Peaks is good. To many others it's not.

I like her well enough. Her acting is stilted and artificial, but this is Lynch to a tee. She also works well as the straight man for Diane, Gordon and Albert.

I loved how he almost seemed to be in disbelief that someone finally got him.

That scene got to me as well. I guess because it really hit home what the country can be in that idealistic Cooper way.

Poor Mike. He was a non-character but I really did want him to be happy with Nadine.