What about the possibility that the sectors that are struggling are in the process of dying a death they deserve to die? Warehouse workers? Does anyone really think that’s a role that’s going to continue to exist in perpetuity? Manual labor is in trouble. Menial white collar labor is in trouble. Not because people are…

“Beyond that: 401Ks (socialism for capitalists!) are the only real methods many Americans can currently enjoy as a way to retire, and even those are wildly going back and forth with no sign of stability.”

Oh my god is a corporation profiting from the misery of the people? Burn it down!

“And you’re all over the place with your single argument that SALT and other deductions are somehow short changing the federal government.”

The image is obviously a comparison between single filers and married filers with two children and would change a bit if you took out the children but it illustrates the point.

I completely understand your position. Your position is that a married couple, despite operating on a combined income, despite the fact that two people in general consume more of everything including government compared to one, should be taxed as though they have individual incomes. You want the benefit of a combined…

I’m all over the place and your sole defense is “but the state contributes more” on something that is entirely a household matter.

“But that “self serving” manner, as you call it, generally pays for better schoolsand other services, which produce a better educated population, which should - as the theory goes - make those states able to attract the companies that make those high paying jobs that you seem to be looking down your nose at possible”

“Married couples do pay the same rate as single taxpayers, except in the top bracket, where married couples are actually penalized. If you make $50,000, and your spouse makes $62,000, your combined income is $112,000, which puts the couple in the 24% marginal tax bracket, the same as if each taxpayer filed as single…

“And why does a state like Mississippi not have a glut of high-paying jobs?”

“People move to cities for opportunity. The more opportunity, the more people want to live there, and the higher cost of living.”

“So we’re just going to skip over the part where you attempted to cherry pick three states out of 13 that are net payers into the system with lower state tax burdens without mentioning the other 10, some of which also have the highest state tax burdens.”

“If my state is using my income tax to address needs in my state, the federal government doesn’t have to”

I’m not saying move out to some small town with a population of 100. I’m saying there are three or four metros in the US that are among the most expensive in the world and unless your skill set is one that is highly local to one of those metros you don’t have a professional justification for being there.

“I’d argue that most jobs don’t have regional requirements”

Texas, New Hampshire, and Wyoming are all net payers when it comes to the federal coffers. Know what else they have in common? Some of the smallest tax burdens in the US.

Completely unrelated.

The people complaining about affordability in these coastal areas aren’t the ones with the specialized jobs that have real regional requirements.

“Why shouldn’t they each get the benefit of paying the tax on their income, rather than being added together and bumped into a higher marginal tax bracket?”

“OK, but saying “Parity” really just restated my question.”