Which is totally valid if we were discussing picking the READING SELECTION. Providing potential triggers in the SYNOPSIS within the SYLLABUS is something else entirely. But I can fix this for you.

Only a narcissist would want every work of art to reflect his own. Heck, that would get old really quick. And a decade in the industry is a long time to get bored with hack 'n slash.

I'd argue that the people who've actually experienced these things might already be aware of them. Maybe even more than a college reading might reveal. Just a thought.

"Not wanting to be confronted with my own experiences of horrific trauma" - coddling for special snowflakes.

Who the f#$% hangs flip-flops? Disgusting.

Still waiting on a plot. Any plot. Please?

It's not every day you see actual isolationist gun porn of this quality.

Please don't take my criticism as an insult. Certainly not the intent.

I'm aware. You are, however, bringing a whole new issue into poor correlation. I find that disrespectful to your own argument. I can even see your argument, agreeing to an extent - you're just not presenting it very well.

...Did you read this one? She complained that they used marinara instead of pizza sauce and refused her a refund. They are the SAME thing. Please put your race whistle away, bro. I am saving it for when I'm denied a job and I can't have you maxing out my shit.

Hat aside, Pharrell Williams is almost certainly real.

Your false accusation is a terrible, criminal act. So is the silence forced onto so many women. If you think being false accused is bad, imagine being ignored after being victimized. I'd think you'd have some empathy for the innocent, rather than just bitterness towards the guilty.

And here I thought I was being earnest and forthright. Alas, my overtures to educate the internet masses on the difference between public policy and private contracts has failed!

...Apparently, neither have you. Allow me to help. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=1st+amendme…

"Insert bullets here"

My issue of the original poster is a claim that these other "false promise" rapes are consensual. Which, even if legally true, is ethically and morally false. It's false on the face of it. And I'm quite testy because you're arguing from a position of 'Isn't it obvious?' and revealing a kind of disturbing lack of…

There is already a difference between good and bad faith in law and common sense. A relationship that didn't work out is one thing. A relationship built on lies for the basis of sexual predation? Is another. And the "most beautiful woman in the bar" line is called puffery. Already legal and totally subjective. Any…

"I'm not a ____" is never a good look, even if you aren't. Best not to say it.

The fact that you consider deceiving anyone to acquire sex, regardless of sex or gender, to be somehow tolerable in any way shows that we don't have the same moral framework for argument. Marital rape was socially accepted (and still is, in many places). Hell, slavery, persecution, and a thousand other social ills…

And perhaps you're just terrible at explaining yourself, but it really comes off as if you consider a less grave offense - I wasn't saying they were LEGALLY the same, though I feel they OUGHT to be. I was drawing a comparison to show a gap in justice. Do you disagree?