Or your loved one will harm or kill you. Y'know, life's a gamble that way. Hold police accountable and I agree - keep them out of most mental health issues. But some things aren't safe. Period.

And this response is why Jezebel doesn't in any way represent a functional feminism.

Such as half of the bitterly embattled, predominantly white, middle class feminists on Jezebel with an obvious axe to grind? Girl is ignorant. But her ignorance didn't just come from Fox and dumb boy friends.. The vocal component of most communities are a problem - and pop feminism is no exception. And social media…

Was a general comparison to the original tweet, not your comment. "Sexual assault is always avoidable" is absolutely terrible wording, as it implies the onus is on "avoiding" rape, rather than on rapists NOT to rape. And that failing to avoid a rape is your own negligent fault. I doubt it's what they MEANT, but they…

Trying? No. Failing? Yes. see also: the Wicked Bible. Never leave that "not" out of a commandment.

That sounds like a Dothraki self-pleasure technique.

Whew. Troll ate their Wiki-Wheaties-a today. This is not a right-wing fundamentalist American movie - in fact, it's kind of the opposite, regardless of the source material.

But ignorance is pretty interchangeable.

And that's why we don't let darkies do much, either. Hate to break troop cohesion.

Speak for yourself, you quivering fuckbucket of horseshit. My swearing is modern, legit, and thoroughly vulgar.

Dear asshole who does not how mental illnessES (there's more than one, kinda like how Africa is not a country) work,

Because RACEIS- er, SEXISM! ...and RACISM! Why not? Let's just get all ISM-y up in here. Because it's ridiculous.

Hell with hawt - I'm talkin' convenient. As a bro who's had to relax shoulder-length black person hair? I hate everybody, and I do mean everybody, who hates on short hair. They are taxing your effort and paying no dividends. Haters? To the left.

Pixie cuts for all! Liberte!

And all of that falls down to a basic problem - free exercise of religion does not and cannot extend to the life and health choices of OTHERS. There is only an argument of religious abuse if, by some insane logic, it is assumed that employers have a direct and personal right to dictate the scope and nature of health…

But neither can Hobby Lobby claim a First Amendment right to impose their views using a federally mandated benefit. See the issue there? It's a backdoor establishment and a terrible precedent to establish. And you can read just fine - your elitist need to establish grammar rules implies a lack of actual, relevant…

Not really. There is nothing in that religion requiring them to run Hobby Lobby, no more than their employees are required to put up with their belief system. If you are not qualified to provide federally-mandated health benefits to your employees?

"created a duty to do something"... like worker's rights laws? Mandatory overtime? Vacation? Wrongful termination laws (so long as THOSE exist...)? Yeah. Ok. And?

If your particularly religious belief extends to how you relate to other citizens? That's exactly what I'm saying. Do you not see the gross abuses possible when you can use the law to dictate your own religious practice onto everyone you work for?

If you cannot perform a required element of your job to due to the law? Then it appears that your religion does not allow you to perform that job, period. Why should your employees suffer your lack of religious conviction?