Actually, I think the reason that she wrote this is the exact opposite. This was a well written and balanced piece instead of the usual biased reporting that always takes the woman’s side. This may actually be the first article in history that acknowledges the possibility that a famous rich man may actually be…

I HAVE to know! Who won the game?

I’m pretty sure he knocked the ball loose as you can see the catcher “double clutch” it after the tag

Wasn’t it the Philly police that dropped a bomb on their own city in the 80s and burned down a whole block of innocent people’s homes? Apparently no one cares

Can’t they test for those things?

I can’t believe that after 6 seasons, people haven’t figured out that going from one scene to another doesn’t mean they necessarily are happening at the same time or even in the same order as we see them. Obviously it took a long time for Dany to prepare the ships, perhaps a month at least. That in no way means that…

I’ve never clicked on any of the Cardinal loss stories. While slightly curious about the origin of the joke, I’m confident that dedicating a whole baseball season to it makes it exponentially less funny.

Thanks, but had Jon actually ever met Littlefinger before? Since Sansa isn’t too keen on sharing information with Jon, we have no reason to think that she told him about Littlefinger. But even if he did know that Littlefinger was slimy, isn’t winning the battle better than getting everyone killed?

That’s what a lot of people want

I totally don’t get why Jon would be opposed to using the Knights of the Vale. Apparently they weren’t buddies with the Boltons, so why not?

That still doesn’t explain why she didn’t tell Jon about them

Can someone expand on why Jon wouldn’t have made that deal with Littlefinger? Considering the knights of the Vale appeared to be the best prepared fighting force in the north, I would’ve thought that they would’ve asked for their help when they were asking everyone else to help them retake Winterfell.

Not the same thing. Their kid won’t be killed by someone else on a trampoline, or someone else in a pool. But someone else can take out a gun and it won’t matter how well you taught your kid about gun safety. If you teach them about trampoline safety and pool safety, etc., at least their safety is under their control,…

Are you saying that you think commercial jets fly at 500 feet? Because they don’t. I’m pretty sure that the FAA could decide to allow non commercial drones at 500 - 1000 feet, or some elevation below commercial traffic, if there was a need for it.

I’m sure any type of future personal transportation drone would fall under similar restrictions as current drones, and would most certainly not be authorized to fly at the same altitude as commercial aviation. I don’t have a crystal ball of course, but I would imagine that any attempt to ban a new form of personal…

Yeah, I agree drones flying less than 500 feet over private property is a no-go. I assume there will be an FAA approved zone for these types of vehicles just above that. Restricting them to the space above public roads doesn’t seem that feasible to me.

The age of self driving electric passenger carrying drones is closer than you think.

Flying over private property is a no go? Are you aware of the vast national aeronautical industry? Most major cities have airports, and the planes all fly over private property.

Really? Because it hasn’t happened yet, you think it won’t? That’s the definition of egocentrism, and it has never proven reliable

Rent Minority Report this weekend.