As somebody who used to work in the tech industry, it really looks like this guy is being scandalized. Sure, from a layman’s perspective his statements seem foolhardy but, in software development, you eventually have to test in the real world to know for sure that there aren’t any unforeseen edge cases you didn’t…

Hahahaha, nice spin. So these guys were “seemingly” ready to “escalate violence”. Meanwhile the leftists WERE committing violent acts and had weapons as well. But yet, let’s not talk about the people actually attacking people and property because mah narrative!

A human driver could easily have handled the situation by slowing down and letting the Camry merge into traffic, but Google’s software wasn’t prepared for this scenario.

A human driver could easily have handled the situation by slowing down and letting the Camry merge into traffic,

You’re either very mislead or you’re being very dishonest on purpose. First of all, some people are excersising their second amendment right. Where’s the problem? They haven’t hurt anyone, they don’t seem to want to hurt anyone. They were acting in the best interests of all parties. This is fear-mongering, plain and…

The question is not whether pasghetticode is “that guy”. The question is whether the Prius failed to yield to the Camry, or whether the Camry failed to yield to the Prius. The only way to determine that is to figure out who had the right-of-way.

It’s certainly polite to do so, but unless California’s rules are different, it’s exclusively merging traffic’s responsibility to find somewhere to merge. Traffic already on the highway has the right of way and has no requirement to slow down, speed up, or get over to accommodate merging traffic.  Though I’ve heard if…

Sounds like the Camry driver is at fault for not slowing down to get behind the Prius, which has right-of-way. The Prius has no obligation to slow down (and it could be argued that it would be unsafe for it to slow down if they’re already traveling side by side).

Counterpoint:  That’s complete BS.

This is a great example of why people hate liberals.

Ah Skittles, challenge accepted! I will probably spit whatever this nasty flavor is right into the trash basket (or the toilet, if it’s really nasty enough!), but this is the sort of marketing ploy that probably make me impulse buy a bag if I ever see one in the wild. It doesn’t sound like there will be a lot of…

YUM!

You’re an idiot. ANTIFA is not a nice and friendly peaceful organization that protests racism.  ANTIFA is a collection of insane and violent borderline communists and anarchists who think it is OK to cold-cock people for the crime of supporting the President or having an American flag. Go to hell.

Stopped caring when you said you were with the Antifa types. Antifa is no different then Hitler’s brownboots. Go and intimidate any viewpoint you disagree with and start a fight then blame the other people for defending themselves. Antifa is literal trash and you associating with them makes you literal trash.…

And what is SPLINTER and all of Gizmodo then?

Same shit, different smell, different spin.

The HuffPost report said the fight broke out after protesters knocked a “Make America Great Again” hat off a Proud Boy’s head.

Completely unrelated to this article... but does anyone else have issues playing embedded Twitter videos in Chrome now? I click the play icon and then the embed goes blank. It’s been happening for a while now and makes for a tough time enjoying sports highlights.

Dude is fast. He should try track.

Those things are not mutually exclusive. Women can be afraid for their safety and men can be afraid of false accusations at the same time.

IDK, wearing a ‘MAGA’ hat at, in, or near a right wing rally of any type could be considered camouflage, IMHO. Especially the way trump has vilified the media. You could get killed out there if the crowd turned on you! If things turned ugly, they might see the hat, and keep looking for someone else to tear into human…