patriarch1
Patriarch1
patriarch1

Because you can also disagree with the infallibility bit as well. The concept was invented to head off a doctrinal disagreement about something or other. It does not mean the Pope is divinely right about every opinion he holds. Otherwise Catholics would only be allowed to support a single soccer team...

Supergirl’s age relative to Superman’s isn’t a defining element of her character though. That’s just a minor tweak, like giving Gandalf a red hat instead of a blue one, or changing which war is in Doctor Watson’s backstory. These things can be changed, or even made plot points, without fundamentally getting the

Not particularly a fan of Superman or any other superhero, but I don’t think this argument holds up.

Ethan Hawke looks good but Willem Dafoe has really let himself go in that photo.

That’s true. There can be only “1" after all.

What he didn’t add, was that the six movies were:

You are right, the write ups say its his wife, and also that Leotardo’s crew have written him off by that point (they are actively conspiring with Tony rather than murdering him as ordered). So if Tony’s murder is from the Leotardo end, it would be on Leotardo’s own order made before his death. As such, Leotardo

The other thing is that there are repeated shots of Meadow trying to park her car on the street. This weird sequence is important because it is temporarily keeping Tony alive.

That’s what I meant. The attack he led (which killed all the bombers and their crews) blew up the dreadnought, as it was about to blow the cap ship.

The whole plan should have failed at the beginning because the dreadnought should’ve fired on the command ship and taken it out first. Then it could have obliterated the resistance base and picked off the other ships. The only reason a handful of rebels made it is because the First Order was even more militarily

BTW there are 5 force users in the original trilogy. 4 of them wear robes, capes and/or skirts. (Yoda, Vader, Obi Wan & the Emperor)

It’s not like it’s a marketplace where rich people can spend more.”

The problem with your wording is that it “breaks” the Saudi law exactly as much as the episode does, i.e. even lukewarm criticism of the government is a “threat to public order”. By that standard, any version of the truth will be illegal.

I’m still wondering if “state of the start” is really what the reviewer meant to write, or just another unedited AV Club gaffe.”

I assume he is acting like a deadbeat because he has been given no reason not to. So either ultimatum, or just dump him like it seems you want to. The sunk cost fallacy is a powerful thing for time as well as money, but it’s still a fallacy. If he turns into the next IT billionaire, how convinced are you that he would 

I love that film!

This name Rollo Tomassi - has it come up during the investigation?

I’m fairly confident all prior presidential assassination attempts (and successes) were carried out by nobodies.”

I’m wondering if the 7 grandmothers thing is part of the Doctor’s extreme aversion to personal details, such as sharing her name. When discussing aspects of her childhood, she just invents a clearly ludicrous lie to dress up the small bit of relevant truth (“this is a fairy story I grew up with”).

I thought the Doctor was going to call Yaz out on it: “You know that isn’t really a thing, right?”. But that would have been a bit harsh, this version doesn’t really go for teasing her companions like that.