GM crops include bacterial poison-encoding DNA or sequences from jellyfish. And then there's the goats that produce spider silk.

Can't shake the feeling this is one of those stories where in 10 years, as measurement techniques improve and more data accumulates, certain GMOs are found to be carcinogenic, and in 50 years that Monsanto pressured the journal into retracting the study.

"how do we feed ourselves, and how do we do it safely?"

But, not a single human study.

Hundreds have shown them to be dangerous, skippy

So no one is suspicious that a research paper stating that the product of one of the most powerful and wealthy companies in the world is redacted?

The true process of science is that if there are no true flaws, publish the study. If it is incorrect, replication will prove it incorrect. If the statistics are that glaring, it would not have been published in the first place.

Just more censure of unpopular ideas. The article should stay, and replications ran to…

But neither are they unambiguously cancer-causing scourges upon humanity.

well history have proven, by example with cigarettes, that major company can sell nocive products, lobby a lot to avoid any proof or research which could light the toxicity and still continue to kill people

exactly! when we sit around a campfire, we also inhale smoke. therefor smoking cigarettes can't be that bad. :-P

as long as humans think they're better than nature working with nature just isn't profitable.

that's all well and good but I think we need to stop working against nature and instead working with it. There's a better way out there, we just need to find it.