parangaricutirimicuaro
parangaricutirimicuaro
parangaricutirimicuaro

No, him and the writers have a TV show that makes fun of those politicians and people who are against that kind of decisions. So it’s important when they say something so tone deaf it makes them look as ignorant as the people they’re supposed to criticize and throws under the bus the people they’re supposed to

Yes yes. I didn’t explain myself correctly, but totally agree with you.

What censorship?!?!?! Criticizing an unfunny joke is not censorship in any way, haha.

But those ideas are opposite. That’s why it doesn’t work.

I didn’t. But the reason it could work is because you can be sarcastic about women having abortions for fun. But you cannot both pretend women don’t make the decisions, and next in the same joke pretend they do.

Yes, apparently. Some dudes think satire is saying something mildly offensive towards groups of people who are already being mistreated, thus punching down without being smart or provocative or anything other than supporting the status quo. It’s sad.

Nobody wants to censor anybody, dude. Whoever wrote that twit wasn’t smart and it just showed probably an intern with lack of comedy skills and knowledge about the subject. As I said before, they could have made a dark sarcastic joke and nail it, but they didn’t. They went for something easy and talked about a subject

Of course! But that’s exactly the problem. They’re supposedly celebrating a win for women and shit but make a joke without even thinking for half of a second about women. And if they think getting a woman intentionally pregnant so she’d have an abortion (yeah, I know it’s hypothetical) is funny, it’s because they’ve

Oh no, it didn’t. Your analogy was indeed better. :)

It’s a thought process that takes less than a second. But you know that and just want to argue, right?

Agree. I actually censored myself because I was already replying to people who thought there was nothing wrong with the joke and just wanted to explain something without getting angry replies. But yeah. There’s a lot of aggression in what the Twit implies (forcing pregnancy on somebody who doesn’t want it -otherwise

Yes, thanks! What you said. My English is bad and I haven’t slept since yesterday so after writing the comment I realized I didn’t write exactly what I was thinking, but that was supposed to be my point. :)
That the Twit was written for straight men at the expense of women, who don’t have abortions for fun, since they

I don’t think the problem is that it’s unfunny, but what it implies.
SCOTUS rule was something really important for women’s autonomy and health, and in the Twitt those same women stopped being subjects of the ruling and became passive objects to be used by the assumed readers (women still watch TDS!). It also

Yeah, she obviously doesn’t know how to chop vegetables in general. There are YouTube videos about that, Blake! Or you can watch your private chef and learn a bit! :)

And what was he wearing?

And who can draw.

I didn’t know who that guy is, but in my mind imagined him meeting M. S. and being all annoying and telling people he’s super famous, and she being all like “Naaah” and he replying “yes yes, ask anybody. I’ve been on the Daily Mail!!”

They’re all naturally really pretty, but what’s up with the makeup? And the poor pale blonde, that suddenly from the middle of season had to wear huge fake eyelashes and sometimes even dark red lipstick for training.

That was the most bizarre. I’m not from the US and have lived in different countries/continents and we’ve all be listening to Nina Simone for decades. She’s world super famous.
The idea that nobody knew who she was until she made a movie is preposterous!

So your point is? Let’s block muslim people from buying guns and having jobs and travel and solve terrorism? (very Trump-y of you). Since it’s not like non-muslim white dudes whom obviously haven’t been in any watch list have committed acts of terrorism in the U.S. lately?
¿?