My bet is that it was bottled in U.S.A. or Mexico.

Heineken is bottled in Holland.

there are a lot of very legitimate reasons not to like her, you mention them, but then gloss over them. She can be kind of awful but is also a victim of a right wing smear campaign at the same time, they aren’t always mutually exclusive. But saying mainstream news pointing out her occasional awfulness means it’s being…

You’re reading your chart incorrectly. That link says there are 776 hispanic/latino women employed there. It’s something like 13000 total women.

Oh god. This is the asshole that’s gonna cause the end of the world? Not an insane genius, but this chucklefuck? Goddamn it that is just not right!

My general rule is that if a couple is always posting public statements about how much they love each other and how happy they are that they are just hiding some dark shit from us and probably from themselves as well.

So in my “real life” I have seen a lot of couples separate, then get back together, then fight publicly, then get back together, then fight privately... ad nauseum. Not that it means much, but they all have posted lots of happy looking Instagram photos, etc., whenever they’re having a Together Moment.*

I always thought they’d work out because they seem like the exact same type of asshole (which is fine, so are my partner and I) but I can see how one person getting more famous exacerbates that.

As a “curvy” chick (honestly, I like to just call myself a fat girl but people take such issue with that) I’m honestly turned off when a guy makes a big deal about being into curvy girls. I like all types of body types on a dude and I’m not making a point to fucking shout it from the rooftops.

Do you mean profit by it in the sense of achieving some measure of fame or success from it? Or do you mean monetary profit? In that case, the artist has stated that she will never sell the work.

When did the party of FDR become the party of Josef Stalin? I will vote Democrat till the day I die, but this HYPER-LEFTIST shit gotta go

While it’s true that they’re not calling for a lifetime ban, they are calling for a cancellation of the show that is opening. Saying this doesn’t qualify as a ban is like saying the Trump Travel Ban doesn’t count as a ban.

that’s the distinction I would make as well. It was tone-deaf, but not outright malicious. Take the painting down, she won’t profit from it, and let her show continue. If the error in judgment was recognized, what more can we want that doesn’t lead to censorship or outright maliciousness on our part?

Good for them.

Oh so a temporary ban?

It’s definitely “a bit much” considering the damn painting at the center of the controversy isn’t even going to be, and for that matter never was going to be, on display at this show.

I completely agree. Art is supposed to be controversial. That’s the whole point.

GOOD. Don’t censor art. Although I’m sure our Orange Overlord would give a fat-fisted thumbs up for the effort.

I can’t help but think banning someone for having painted a single controversial work is a bit much.

Me too. Also, it just sounds fun to say when I'm driving through traffic. Hey chucklefuck! Get outta my way! It really brings a smile to my face.