He’s very much Stock Handsome White Man

Instead of a madonna/whore dichotomy, I think Trump employs a fat pig/bimbo dichotomy. Kelly is not fat or ugly, and she’s not a bimbo because she keeps challenging him. At first, he was pissed that she was given permission to do so, but now that it’s clear FOX isn’t going to hide her away to appease him, she is now…

I think there is something weird and psychosexual in his inability to take criticism from her. He cannot abide her not liking him - her dissent. At first, it seemed like the usual politician versus pesky reporter war, but it’s not. There’s something about her being female that he cannot stand.

Or indentured servitude. Last week Dear Prudie got a letter from a woman saying she and her husband didn’t want kids, but should they at least have one so someone would take care of her (she was younger than the husband) in her old age. All I could think was “You don’t read nearly enough advice columns or you’d see…

That poor kid and his poor sisters, who were basically just told via major news outlets that they’re not good enough.

Yeah these people should not be making more people.

Its like how often the only way to get a creep to leave you alone is to say you’re already dating someone. Women and, their thoughts and feelings, don’t matter in and of themselves, but only as they relate to a man. Once again demonstrating that a disturbingly large number of men just don’t see women as real people.

How about, “This is how Trump talks about 50% of Americans?” Who cares if she’s a mother/sister/daughter/wife?

Convenient how at the end no one mentions that this is how he talks about US. An ad full of women, and no, we’re not upset on account of our little old selves, heavens no! We’re just upset that he’s talking this way about men’s wives! Men’s sisters! Men’s DAUGHTERS!

This would be quite effective were it not for the fact that “women: you have to treat them like sh*t” is the subtext for the entire Republican party.

Um, really? You’d think that drug addicts would be happy as long as they just had social tolerance and access to their drugs? If that’s the case, why in God’s name should anyone frown on drug addiction?

Unusual or offbeat people are always going to catch shit from people who think, for one reason or another, that mocking others makes them look good. If the testimony from the locals is true it sounds like it’s rolling right off their collective back. Keep on saving the birds, ladies, it’s a fine mission, and one that…

I support legalization, IN THEORY, because I believe consenting adults should do whatever they want in the bedroom, and also because, in theory, one would think that bringing sex work “out of the shadows” would make women safer. However, my fear is that legalization would only allow traffickers and pimps to hide in…

My policy on prostitution has gotten increasingly conservative since moving into a neighborhood plagued by prostitution. I’d like not to have to call the cops every other night because a john is parked in front of my house banging a prostitute, and I’d like to be able to walk around the neighborhood without used…

By making it harder to distinguish between who if there out of choice and who is there by force. Amsterdam and a city in Spain have become the top places for Russian mobsters to funnel women who were tricked into thinking they would doing some other appointment.

And to be honest, I will probably still look down on people who pay for sex. I won’t look down on sex workers ever, but I still will judge a person who thinks sex is something that can be bought.

That’s not really surprising. There’s a segment of people who think sex work is deeply immoral. There’s a segment of people who think legalizing sex work is either harm reduction or sex positive.

Legalized sex work is different from decriminalized sex work (see Nordic model).

You seem to have confused legalization (which most sex workers oppose) with decriminalization (which most sex workers support).