pandorasmittensv3
pandorasmittens version 3.0
pandorasmittensv3

When more people actually voted for your opponent, it’s hard to rally the proverbial troops under the banner of “look how much support I have!”

This is absolutely relevant. I think it’s confusing even among relatively woke white women as to what we should be doing a lot of the time. Is this where I sit down and shut up, or is this where I add my voice?

You guys are nothing if not predictable.

Said the pot to the kettle.

Scared by crowds and strangers introvert here agreeing with you. It was so cathartic and unifying to me to hear the group scream well up and explode here in Chicago. I marched with a group that was warm, funny, welcoming and very diverse.

So we can expect you at the next Farmworkers march right? Or the next immigrations march? Or at Standing Rock (which IIRC, you did not attend?).

Said the (potentially white) male. I found this sign unnecessarily condescending. This is not how you win people over to helping in the fight.

I think it’s interesting to watch a metaphorical infant taking its first steps, and then trash said infant for not being able to run a 40-yard-dash in record time. That, to me, is what this article does.

So protests only matter when you’re uncomfortable and/or under threat of violence? Someone downthread described this as a “woker-than-thou” contest, and she/he is exactly right.

And if they don’t what are you going to do? Pat yourself on the back for being right while the nation crumbles around you? You want results without investing in the process and instead disparage the process.

For many it is and was the first step. I see a lot of people shitting on those new to activism. Frankly you can choose to be pissed that these people didn’t have your back before, or choose to use this opportunity to turn these people. You had a bunch of people try activism for the first time and it felt good. They’re

I agree. Our next steps are to engage these women further. We have this platform, now we need to keep everyone involved.

This all feels a bit too cute by a half. Valid concerns, many of which have been expressed people all throughout the Democratic coalition, but in this case, in a way to try and lord them over something undeniably good because you’re obviously holier than thou. Quite frankly, it’s tacky and messy.

My protest is better than your protest

Likewise: I was at the march in DC, and I loved the diversity of purpose: women’s rights, Black Lives Matter, pro-disability, Support Your Local Sex Worker, trans visibility and rights, pro-immigrant. I got the chance to talk with the people carrying those signs, and now I know more about what these movements (not all

I work for an advocacy organization. We all went to the march, with our friends and our families.

My $0.02, FWIW.

Honest question: Why the attachment to distrust? What does that serve you? Your argument about maintain concern is valid. But why make a series of blanket assumptions about the participants and their enthusiasm? What is wrong with taking part? What does suspicion and fatalistic thinking accomplish that staying focused

What’s with these purity tests that people on the left require of one another?

While I understand there are valid critiques of the Women’s March, and they have been discussed elsewhere including other Jezebel articles, this here piece just kinda stinks of “gotta pick apart something!” I think part of the strength of the right is that they rarely eat each other the way we do on the left. No one