Oh.
Oh.
Could someone explain the use of "TRIGGER WARNING" to me? Trigger what?
You're right. Main reason why I'm staying away from getting a studio job in the animation industry when I'm done with school. (Which, due to some revamps in the graduation requirements, has turned my last few quarters into never ending "crunch"...)
I mean the polygonal remakes. Apologies for failing to specify.
Nothing wrong with that. I've wanted to play the DS version, but don't own a DS, so...
Nah. Neither is IV. I don't know what the Hell they've been waiting for, either! >:I (Aside from a contract with Nintendo to make them timed exclusives...)
Yeah... A few of the entries were straight up copies. They should have never been submitted. It's supposed to be a photoshop contest, not a best somewhat relevant photoshop you found elsewhere contest. Meh. :/
There they go, being politically correct!
Roger that.
Hypotheses require no respect. I didn't say you were trying to force-convert anyone. I said you should try it, if their differing opinion bothers you all that damn much. (Though it's funny that they turned out to be one of the non-offended Christians that I mention...)
I guess some things are in the eye of the beholder.
Offense is taken, not given. You don't have the right to not be offended. If you disagree, then maybe you should try converting the OP...I'm sure you've got some very convincing arguments.
The names of the weapons weren't the issue. The issue is that all you got were two alternate swords, and the only thing different about them, besides their appearance, was a re-balancing of their speed and power.
Sure, I'll concede that much. But neither the OP's, obviously. So you've at least failed in assuming that he would or should.
Religion, and/or your god-man, haven't earned respect.
I gotta say, I love these kids even more because of this: [www.gametrailers.com]
Tell me what part of any of this earned respect.
Dante's Inferno 2....CONFIRMED! :D
Hahaha. You're welcome. :P
Yeah. I really don't care for the animated intro.