That one’s a Pontiac.

It worked fine when they launched the SN95!

I understand your sentiment, but it’s best to assume that all 50 of the states matter. The Clinton campaign assumed that Michigan and Wisconsin were some deals, and, well, we all know how THAT turned out.

How do you demand a REcount when the initial count is still underway?

Done!

And Ben Carson, who is inexplicably still head of HUD.

Not only that, but in rural America (where I’m from, where I’m surrounded by fuckwit Republicans), there are no other schools TO choose!

Also, would miscarriages be manslaughter? Or maybe negligent homicide?

And Lisa “well, I could vote in favor of witnesses and evidence to make this a real, fair trial, but I don’t think it’s going to be a fair trial” Murkowski!

There are a few “anyone but Collins” PACs. As an upstate New Yorker, I’m tempted to throw a bunch of money their way.

I’m not saying the t-tops had anything to do with the rear of the frame rail or the grenade hole in the door. But the puddles in the back seat certainly didn’t do my floor pan any favors.

Agreed on all counts.

Needlessly? Compare LA today with LA 30 years ago, or Beijing.

I think you meant G-bodies. 15 years ago (fuck, has it been that long?) my first Monte Carlo (‘88 SS) had t-tops. The rear floor was held together by the carpet thanks to all the water that ran down the b-pillars.

The baller move was her statement about ripping it up: “it was the courteous thing to do considering the alternative.” God DAMN!

I will agree that most of what you’ve posted seems meaningless.

Math is hard.

25% is basically nothing? Huh.

Indeed. You’ll note that someone else was making that argument.

Oh, I know. 98% of the time it is way too big for my needs. However, 1) it was the smallest vehicle in the US with sliding rear doors, and b) I wasn’t the one arguing that a certain vehicle was too small. My 2001 Civic with a Class I receiver was perfect, but I got sick of fighting to get my son into the back seat.