The game is idiotic anyone who plays it is a childish dolt.

Just don’t start hogging all our GPUs to mine your cardboard, please.

Every time we get a game that looks like this I sit back and wonder why no one has made a good fantasy adventure game for Redwall yet.

Are the new additions gonna at least be available to those of us who already have the damn game...?

My guess is that it’s because players aren’t opting in to have their orcs be the opponents in the fight pits. When I put my orc in, I’m committing to dealing with the consequences. But the player whose game contains the orc I’m facing has not done so.

I read that somewhere too. It’s easier to tell characters apart since usually their faces aren’t vastly different from each other.

lol what are you going on about

Just to add to how ridiculous this ad is, our protagonist is watching a Dota video in Windows Media Player.

I found it hard to find words that it reacts to. I type in quite a few words before I find one that does something. Its a fun little distraction, but I wouldnt call it a game really.

There’s friendly fire

...it’s not portable? The dock is pretty damn small and light and the AC adapter is no larger than, say, a laptop charger.

Oh my god. It’s not predatory. Fuck. He kept the game x number of days. It costs x dollars per day to keep said game. He returned it. He got charged the price of that There is nothing predatory about this. It’s just simple math and common sense.

I’ve been playing the game for a few weeks now and talking to the devs, this is the biggest issue they’ve got on their hands: how to deal with the directors in a public matchmaking system. Most games, even right now, are played with the automatic director which is really fine by itself, and it could very well be the…

Yeah, along with the “toxic” line, this one stood out:

Yeah, that was a incredibly naive statement. It’s almost guaranteed that not only will all these features be exploited by players but harassment will also be amplified by toxic players with actual power over the people they are playing with. I don’t see this system working out to well.

I think they’re just saying they expected the punchline to come last, not be mixed in like a “which of these things is not like the others” puzzle. Wario’s bio becomes a bit extraneous if you’ve already said the punchline of the joke.

Kotaku has a piece on how the new games are obsessed on a thematic level with BJ’s body, and how in the beginning his body is broken down and running on fumes. I actually appreciate the difficulty because it creates a dissonance between the Terror-Billy the Nazis spoke of in hushed tones and the broken husk of a man…

Definitely why I stopped playing the game. I really enjoyed the concept, but having to try to suss out which response was actually what I wanted proved impossible. Guy is clearly lying, I select doubt, Cole starts throwing shit instead of just saying “you’re lying.”

I feel like those still are not accurate descriptors of the choices. You’re supposed to use Truth when the witness is being honest with you, Doubt when the witness is lying but you don’t have proof, and Lie when the witness is lying and you do have proof. Why can’t they make that clear?