I burnt my finger on that take. : (

This is a perfect answer for all of the OT coin toss truthers.

That really is quirky research!!

I didn’t know we were friends, but thanks for asking for me!

Good lord. That move is 50% MC Hammer, 50% Street Fighter, and 100% disturbing...

A family that blazes together, is a family that stayses together...

So, Rick Pitino did something vulgar and wildly inappropriate for a few seconds... Aren’t there more important stories out there? I heard Mante Te’o’s girlfriend has cancer!!

I’m torn on this matter. For me it’s a case of least terrible... One of the top brands is called a “Swagway” which makes me want to stab myself in the Hippocampus. Since I don’t think “DoucheCart” is going to catch on, maybe it’s just time we accept it until a real hoverboard comes along.

It’s not a reviewable play because it’s a non-detectable call. There’s no way for the replay official to establish indisputable evidence, one way or the other, of precisely where the ball was in relation to the upright when it travelled over the crossbar. It would be a judgement call, at best, which prohibits the call…

Two problems with the laser thing... First, I don’t think shining a laser infinitely into the sky would accomplish anything. You would need a detector to report that the beam was broken — like the safety laser that’s installed on garage doors. Second, in the NCAA the ball has to pass entirely inside of the upright.…

Let’s say, for poops and giggles, that the replay official looks at the kick... Show me an angle that can show the indisputable evidence needed to overturn the call.

It’s the right call. The NCAA rulebook says the entire ball has to clear the inside of the upright. There’s a good reason why the call isn’t reviewable if the kick is above the upright — it’s impossible to establish indisputable evidence to overturn the call on the field. The replay would have to show where the ball…