onetrueping
Michael Anson
onetrueping

Unfortunately, these are only available for streaming immediately, it appears. So no adding them to your collection for later.

So, business as usual, except we only pay once a year? Where do I sign up?

Or, maybe, people will enjoy fights that require skill and tactics instead of simple numbers and patterns.

There’s no justifiable reason for Sanders to remain in the race

In the meantime, whoever wins the primary, it’s pretty important to vote AGAINST more Trump. Status quo is far better than destroying our existing monuments, forests, and legislations.

My hope is for a bit of the Indiana Jones-styled adventure map travel conceit. A big open map with locations on it, red arrows drawing across the map with some sepia cutscenes in the background showing travel progress, and treat each location as an open world area to explore. It’d balance the overall size of the world

This really isn’t a hard problem to solve. Set up a subscription service akin to Netflix specifically for library systems. Set a sliding price and level of access similar to the number of books the systems would normally be purchasing, so they aren’t having to pay for more than they can afford/have access to, but the

I’m trying to decide which is more annoying. That there’s a Kotaku employee whose situation is perfect for reviewing something like this, or that the fat jokes in the comments ignore the disabled gamer crowd.

So, you’re stating my point for me: Epic is using a lure (up front cash) to convince developers to exclusively use the Epic store, and thus preventing them from using other stores even if it turns out that such exclusivity generates bad press, is detrimental to sales, and offers no real benefits other than that up

Of course not. Politically speaking, this lawsuit is a win-win for the nonprofits. If they lose, it's a complicit government at fault, and they can push for legislative reform. If they win, it's a blow against polluting corporate interests and a huge PR noon. They literally cannot lose unless the judge points out that

You know, not every book has to change the world in earthshaking ways. In fact, constant world-threatening crises is a great way for a setting to go stagnant. That’s one of the big failings of fantasy fiction, the laser-like focus on “big problems” and epic solutions, at the expense of smaller, equally compelling,

Bang has some decent sugar free flavors lurking in their offerings. I avoid most of them, though. Some people will drink anything 

Reading comprehension, my dude, the two statements are in no way contradictory. “Binding a developer to an exclusivity contract” means what it says: once the decision has been made by a developer, they are bound to it, regardless of whether or not it turns out to have been a good idea. They no longer have a choice for

Who said it wasn’t? But that doesn’t make it any less of a predatory action on Epic’s part, either.

With literal actual contracts. What part of that is hard to wrap your head around? The developers already get to live with both the stigma of a delayed release after the hype has died down on top of a year's worth of sales due to a lack of more general availability. Epic is making the anticompetitive, anticonsumer

Origin is EA’s own games. They don’t pay for exclusives. GOG and Steam do not pay for exclusives; any games that are exclusive to the platforms are due solely to choice by the developers. There is a world of difference between a developer choosing a single storefront and a storefront binding a developer to an

I honestly don’t care how many free games they give away. I have a large library across multiple services as it is, and prefer to spend mine on services that don’t enforce exclusivity contracts on developers.

There have been a lot of competing tablets released since the days of Wacom's dominance. Why not review some of them, as well?

West Virginia?

TETSUOOOO!