It’s pretty disingenuous to discuss sexual harassment with Trump and completely ignore Clinton and Kennedy.

Don’t you know fungi work best in the dark?

Honestly? I think so. No one likes to admin that they were conned by a drifter.

Hmm...

Well said, Dave. I am also a liberal veteran and having served in Iraq during the “occupation” in ‘07-’08, I have a very conflicted view on the merits of joining the military now. I was one of the ones who joined because I wanted to do something cool and ended up finding a purpose. I felt I was doing some real good…

I’m torn. I’m a veteran of the 1st Iraq Shit Show and the Cold War. I didn’t join out of patriotism, I was in a crappy small town and I wanted out. It worked. Being the military actually MADE me a Liberal. (Kind of hard to hate people for the color of their skin when you share a life with them, hard to hate…

*Planets. Space Marines and the Human Imperium will turn their own planet sterilizing WMD against their own populations to prevent the spread of heresy and mutation, or to prevent the influence of aliens (dirty xenos)  from spreading.

Orange Julius was one of my early favorites.

This is a very important project to help people understand how science gets done and why not everything they hear about on the news is going to save lives. It also explains why I can so frequently be found around here being unimpressed by mouse data.

Insults?

Well we don’t live in a world where you are ignored or ostracised anymore, for those awakening to their emotions there are more than enough sources of validation and comfort, so your arguement in those terms is irrelevent.

..and if the only thing you draw for my posts is ‘exclusion’

No, hypocrisy, in relevence to this context is when you claim, what is considered to be an ‘openminded stance’ then disparage anyone who doesn’t hold the opinions you wish to promote.

I think if you look at the format my posts take and then look at those argueing equally vervently for their own pov’s you’d see there’s nothing ‘rantish’ about what I’m saying, or at least less rantish than those who reply to me.

Of course have an instinctual bias, I’m hetrosexual. Are you attempting to cast aspersions on the validity on my biases? Are you trying to say that homosexuals don’t hold instinctual biases to their own point of view?

I shouldn’t have to define ‘necessity’ to you.

See, you’re all too focused on your own point of view to actually understand what I’m saying.

and it’ll damage them because they DON’T see it on TV?

IMPLICIT NORM?