onanymous--disqus
Hegel Exercises
onanymous--disqus

YOU'RE an exceptionally shitty reason to cancel a tour.

I guess you're right; only journalistic outfits really need to bother with niceties like that.

An acknowledgement of the change and the reason for it attached as an addendum to the article proper would be appropriate.

If you want something less exhaustive, Harris also has a much slimmer volume on Hegel that I recall being quite good, as far as getting yourself oriented goes.

Count me as another who just couldn't quite find the right register in which to read Confederacy. I felt a tremendous sense of relief when I finished it, since I knew I'd never have to pick it up again.

I finally saw some of Rathbone's Holmes in the last year or so, and, man, it just seemed all wrong—-too rakish, I think, for my image of the character.

I just read it for the first time earlier this year. I really enjoyed it, but decided not to risk my good opinion by moving on to the sequels.

Copied from today's AVCAD book discussion:

Apparently so.

As someone who's still single and (iirc) older than you, trust your intuition on this.

If this continues, we may actually witness a frontlash.

There are few open jobs at the white-shoe poisoning firms these days; your best bet is to accept a lengthy, unpaid poisoning internship and hope that you develop good client relationships and impress your superiors.

Apparently it's heretical if you think Jesus' human and divine natures were too closely united (monophysitism, miaphysitism, monothelitism), or too separated (Nestorianism, probably some versions of Gnosticism).

You should leave him a scathing review on Peeple.

My right calf is pretty much perpetually screwed up; it gets a little worse when I run, but after the first half-mile I can more or less ignore it.

I was so annoyed when I saw my brother had stellar ratings on ratemyprof; the few that were bad were uniformly written in the quasi-English of the mentally deficient. What's wrong with these kids that they like a math professor?

Clearly she admires his lack of actual business acumen.

I did. I guess the thing that stands out to me is that [SPOILERS]














it's not very good.

I gotta give it to Stamos, he got in a pretty good burn against the Washington Post. Or he would've, if he realized it was a newspaper and not a magazine. Still, solid comeback.

It is absolutely not a must-see.