They’re afraid of him.
They’re afraid of him.
He would get fired; she’d get a settlement; we’d never hear of it.
I’ll have hers if she doesn’t want it.
I must still be a candy-dandy, wide-eyed fool because I mostly found this story upsetting.
Dale. Snitterman.
Look at the names of the rest of the little creatures though. They’re all like that! And Faulkner wouldn’t be that hard to happen upon, I’d argue the author is more well known than the mid-market news anchor.
or “how many people can I manipulate into worshipping me?”
I was thinking the same thing. I feel bad for his sisters =(
He’s straight up schizotypal, too.
Thank you for your perspective.
Ok - so minors and elderly miners whose asses Samer could kick.
Definitely that stupid kid chef... of the above he seems the most smug.
You’re doing God’s work. I was so mad.
No. You’re wrong and you’re disgusting. Just because you’ve decided that a 14-year-old girl is somehow the sexual equivalent of a 17-year-old boy doesn’t make it true.
This is a company that won’t allow birth control to be covered by their insurance plan. I don’t have a ton of faith in them - this is being done in order to provide scientific “support” for the bible, not to preserve a historically accurate depiction of events.
Yes... but it’s not like my butt forms an air-tight seal with the chair...
I think for a lot of people, being a Christian isn’t so much about living by God’s rules - it’s about exercising power over other people and feeling like you’re special.
Not only that, but you know they’re buying up all this stuff and either destroying or hiding artifacts that don’t support their preferred history of the bible.
I guess my point is to take her arguments with a grain of salt. Similar to punditry.
That’s the example I’m most familiar with too. There are other, smaller ones here and there, but for me something so intellectually dishonest calls her other arguments (or at least the ‘evidence’ she uses to support them) into question.