You’re over-pathologizing. Stop it with your arm-chair psychologist BS.

Misogyny - you’re doing it.

There’s a difference between being insecure because of how society defines gender roles and “believing in sexist misperceptions,” mansplainer.

Women having various viewpoints on an issue instead of just conforming to one simple opinion for the sake of making things easy for men.

Ahhhh the classic mansplain.

... I’m surprised there’s nothing about training law enforcement to take instances of domestic abuse and violated restraining orders more seriously? This seems to be a huge blind-spot in their plan.

I end up sharing my bed with my fiance and at least one cat... I kind of love it. It makes me feel secure.

I want to throw my hat in the “you’re an asshole” ring.

“No Intelligence Allowed” was an example, not the full scope of my interaction with conservative ideas.

I would point to various Muslim cultures. Showing hair is considered “immodest.”

...re: covering hair... large swaths of the earth’s population DO require women to cover their hair... similarly to how our society requires women to cover their breasts while others do not.

Your logical fallacy: No true Scotsman

I didn’t say anything about children being around them.

The functions aren’t mutually exclusive. When breasts are always on display, it removes the “shock value” of seeing them... also, I don’t know why you would assume that the men would have to be constantly aroused if they found them attractive.

They are purely functional... and part of that function is sexual attraction.

I’m pretty sure God doesn’t even WEAR pants.

I try... for example, I watched “No Intelligence Allowed,” by Ben Stein hoping to hear something compelling...

Only a doofus would demand that a bear be held legally or morally accountable for its actions.

Yeah - having worked with Forensic Psychiatrists for awhile... I’m kind of hoping she pleas GBMI.

That hair though. It actually makes me angry.