Aw yeah! When it comes to strategic bombers, Northrop ftw! When it comes to tactical fighters, though, I get torn apart piece by piece...

While I do see your point, I respectfully disagree. I think the weapons are just as good as the platforms they are launching from, just as how the platforms are just as good as their pilots.

Is there a 1366x768 version?

Well, I can definitely say that was an interesting development.

*Super Hornet not pictured

Counter-argument:

The Raptor is originally made for air superiority, with multirole updates adapted to it later in its life. It’s not exactly optimized for air-to-ground sorties as well as the Lightning II.

Eric, I like the F-35, but I don’t think it’s easier to maintain than a Super Hornet. Primarily because it uses stealth technology, and those things, as far as I’ve heard, from stories with the Raptor and the Nighthawk, are rather difficult to maintain.

And here I am, reading all the comments regarding “paid DLC” or “manual transmission” (which, while I do miss, I wouldn’t mind at all so long as it’s a good game).

I wonder when the first paid DLC is coming.

I want to believe.

It was very much a good airframe. However, I think it didn’t justify its cost compared to the Raptor airframe, which performed just as spectacularly, if not better, for less.

“Cool” is too subjective. One could say that the F-86s or the ‘Stangs are the coolest, another might say the J-20 trumps all.

If this fails to be real, I will die. If this is real, I will die.

Well, Smart Waddles was voiced by Tyson himself, so yeah. :P

Well, let’s turn him into a fictional character, shall we?

He already got tea-bagged by five snowtroopers.

“My biggest issue is it still just feels like Battlefield...”

I’m one of the few people who appreciate the 996 right now. Probably due to the fact that it was the first 911 I’ve ever known, specifically the GT3 model.

That’s not as in-sync as the one in Fuji...