oliverphonglehorn
Oliver Phonglehorn
oliverphonglehorn

I think even more than that, it was the fact that in the books anything that comes to life in the cupboard is a real person being pulled from some point in history. If Darth Vader and Duke can come to life, does that mean they're real? It just goes a step too far outside the reality the story creates for itself.

These are good books. I liked that Banks started with a cool premise and then exploring different aspects and possibilities.

Would you have responded more positively to it if they had dragged out "Rainbow Connection" yet again?

Have you read the Muppet Robin Hood comic book from a few years ago?

I laughed out loud at that, although I don't think I could tell you why it was funny.

That's the opposite of terrible. Way too many people seem to believe the Muppets must be exactly the same as in their memory of whatever Muppet production they saw when they were five years old.

I like the fan suggestion that they shoot a new 3-D Muppet film and either switch over or rotate between the two.

I firmly believe that the majority of people who say "They should just do The Muppet Show again!" would not actually sit through full-length musical numbers and corny sketches. On the other hand, those people probably aren't watching this series either.

It must be so frustrating for the performers, writers, et al. If they try to do something different and interesting with the characters, half the audience complains that it's not like it was 35 years ago. But if they did nothing but rehash what they've already done, the other half of the audience would just shrug

I would love to see Deadly make a guest appearance on any reality show, talk show… anything. It would be great to get more of him in the "real" world.

What about Clay Fighter? That one was wacky fun.

Going to Netflix.com and searching for "Bunheads" reveals that no, it's not. But you can get the season on Amazon Video for $24.99.

Exactly. It's certainly in character for both Wolverine and Deadpool to curse and do violent things, but I honestly couldn't say Deadpool is a more "R-rated character" than Wolverine, who has thus far appear in PG-13 movies.

It was Thom Cruz, actually. Perhaps so Marvel wouldn't get sued by Scientology?

Where did that notion come from, anyway? His defining appearances were published under the Comics Code Authority, which never allowed anything R-rated.

She's a good character and she's been in some great comics, but she's never exactly been an A-lister capable of keeping a solo title at the top of the charts.

Whereas before now you expected Fuller House to be a classy, high-quality program?