"They're antiwar etc, but weirdly Austrian in their economics."

Those carbs and sugars will kill you, stick with the outside aisles of the supermarket and you'll feel better.

Stefen, Canadian.

And your citation?

That's fair, I hope you get a chuckle.

I'd agree with everything you said until you said that Government is somewhat accountable because of democracy. Excuse me while a gag with laughter.

You have no argument from me that government is inefficient and bureaucratic to such a degree that a 'evil mission' is not really a part of the discussion. It's all just the result of good ethics that don't apply to everyone equally.

No, it's gubbermint. And if you don't think so then stop paying your taxes, refuse to comply, resist when they come to kidnap and imprison you, and see if the men in costumes behave all that differently from The Godfather thugs.

My point is you may have monopolies, you may have business abuses of all kinds, but you can't have a capital "C" Corporation without government. And yes singular evil is facile. Evil is really a thousand unethical cuts.

Yep, I admit it, I'm a typist when it comes to cap locks. Sort of like farting in a crowded room. Doesn't make you a bad person, just rude.

I wouldn't say either emotional or paranoid, my original comments accurately defined a corporation, nothing more. The rest was a bunch of old ladies inferring their own ideas and issues.

That's some balls trying to keep a progressive soaked word like 'liberal' in play, especially if you think it can also represent laissez-faire economics. Works perhaps with some academics, but talk about a word with serious branding problems. As a 'limited government' movement, IMHO, seems like libertarian is…

More people that have a little history under their belt. Nice.

We are different people, with different views, you should not be lumped with me, nor me you. Although I saw you quoted Rothbard, so you can't be all bad.

Bingo! I knew you were the only one in the conversation with your thinking cap on.

Hey now, you know a little history. Although I think you're oversimplifying libertarianism as it exists today. Current libertarianism is a real stew of ideas and terms, all under the gravitational pull of the Blue Team/Red Team politics that wish to absorb people as voters. Which puts people in the 'lesser evil'…

Using a fake ip and pretending to hide from the NSA is hardly a good litmus test. Obamabot? You don't like an idea and have to run to ad hominem attacks, says more about you than me.

So someone that doesn't believe in the ethics of government shouldn't post in the world they actually have to live in? And Ayn Rand shouldn't have taken Social Security. You live in the world of the bread and circus just as I do.

You're not sewing the seeds of anarchy, you're just appearing ignorant on a subject. Follow up on the philosophy of self ownership and non-aggression principle. Neither has anything to do with being purposefully ignorant - both have everything to do with reasoned philosophy.

Yes, the ethics and philosophy still exist, although the word itself probably can't be rehabilitated.