Out of your league, I am sure. It’s moot, because you couldn’t catch her.
Out of your league, I am sure. It’s moot, because you couldn’t catch her.
It’s every ‘Muricans god given right to be a dick but not be called out for it because that makes them feel sad.
which most people know as “not being a dick”
Because political correctness (which most people know as “not being a dick”) is destroying our country, see. Not sure how that works but that’s what I’ve been told.
Especially when “closure” requires something from someone else. I hate that. I’ve had to talk several girlfriends from bugging their exes for “closure.”
Mine is “closure”. I fucking hate the entire concept, and it’s like if you don’t get or feel closure, here’s another thing you’ve failed at. The reality is some things are just so big, it takes a lifetime to deal with them.
Guy’s got a point. :(
You’re exactly right. I was trying to head off the stupid “but men and women aren’t equal, women have boob and babies, duh!” arguments that often get thrown around in response to the term “gender equality.” Your comment rightly points out that I did so inarticulately and that I inadvertently reinforced the needless…
It’s not “which hot famous celebrity I want to fuck”; it’s “my friend Susan has droopy tits but looks like she’d give good head. Share this with all the other men who know her.” That you cannot seem to tell the difference is entirely your own cognitive deficiency, not the fault of the article or any commenters here,…
I teach college and yes, this is ever more the case for me as well, believe me. Yet these are adults, granted all the privileges and responsibilities of adults.
What? If you’re attempting to draw some tediously asinine false equivalency between a national magazine consensually publishing dressed photos of a celebrity and men publishing “fuckability” scores of women they actually know and work with, good luck with those reasoning skills in the real world, my friend.
Right? “meticulously evaluate, rank, and document on a public, shared forum.”
Oh, yeah, “girls” are the problem here. Right.
How do so many people not see the difference between “talk about” and “meticulously evaluate, rank, and document?”
At the end of the day, you should do another blog post comparing the comments on the Deadspin vs. Jezebel posts. Should be “interesting.”
It sounds like it was ongoing, and the players were lying about it.
What planet do you inhabit where boys* publish numerical livestock evaluations and detailed descriptions of the “fuckability” of their sports teammates in a crowd-sourced document?
I saw the article on same topic over at Deadspin earlier today, and the neanderthal comments made me so angry I had to stop reading. Anyone else?
It’s the only part of the Ivy League that isn’t gross, since it was originally just a sports league designation. But that’s an easy mistake to make and omg why do I know that?
It’s so unfair when shitty actions have consequences. :(