ohnoromogoes
OhNoRomoGoes
ohnoromogoes

Not sure if you understood the comment. The median earner could take home something like 1/30th of the top earner, the bottom earner maybe 1/100th. For instance, that would translate to a lowest paid worker earning $8 per hour ($16,640 annualized), the median earner $26.67 per hour ($55,466 annualized), and the top

Totally agree there would be difficulty in implementation and many smart people (smarter than I) would need to work through the caveats; but think about your contractor point for a second, the rate of pay for the head of JanitorTechnologies would be extremely limited if the whole of his company made $7 per hour, who

For the McDonalds instance, Steve Easterbrook made 7.9 million last year, which is a 368% increase over his 2014 salary of 1.69 million as the Chief Branding Officer. The company has been doing relatively poorly over the preceding few years excluding the inclusion of All Day Breakfast, and he has been part of the

There are actually some fantastic studies that show the turnover in C-suite gigs is around 18 months because bad leaders tend to get rehashed around. I challenge you to find a correlation between the rate of pay among executives and company financial performance. You are also assuming that all execs can just find a

So, this logic falls apart pretty quickly when you realize that LeBron is in fact a worker, not the owner. In this scenario Dan Gilbert would have his earnings tied to what the workers made (LeBron does not make more than him, for instance). As I stated, you could have 30 to one for the median salary (which would be

Instead of focusing on more ways to funnel money into the federal government (where both sides can point out a ton of waste, though they may not agree which departments), why not directly tackle the issue? Tie the median level to the top earner in any given organization...i.e. the median worker’s annualized income

Did you see this:

Better idea: put two on the front bumper and two on the back bumper to ward off trash parallel parkers?

So, the train of logic here is 1. Russia wants to destroy the world (along with themselves), so they 2. aided Trump to defeat Hillary because 3. Trump will cause/start a nuclear war?

Zero sympathy? Having zero sympathy for the person because he had innocuous words on a car gets dangerously close to validating the asshole who torched a car because he didn’t like a sign.

If for no other reason (which there are plenty of), this concept is idiotic for being constructed with almost the perfect design to shear your head off during a rollover. Its like “reinventing” the location of the gas cap and cigarette lighter to right next to each other, separated by a piece of aluminum foil,

Or, maybe the joke was poking fun at parsing out sexuality and differences into infinite discreet groupings creates a bit of a disjointed message with the whole unity thing? “Everyone needs explicit definition of their personhood and we all need to be cognizant of every individuals wishes/desires/feelings and what

33k is too much if you are considering a used Q50, that is hybrid territory. The CPO for Infiniti is also not as all-inclusive as the normal manufacturers warranty (which runs to 60k miles anyway), so it isn’t a massive differential:

You have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If you aren’t happy with the neighbor exercising his liberty to own something he needs on the property he also owns, feel free to pursue your happiness elsewhere...perhaps the country as you suggested.