Looks like you are upsetting the snowflakes. But fact of the matter is you are right, cant have your cake and eat it too.

Because corporations don’t actually pay tax directly, their customers do. And ultimately, most of those customers are just regular people. It’s more than just a theory, but the degree to which it benefits the average Joe is up for debate and is very easily “oversold” to people (see: Trickle Down)

Please explain how lowering the corporate tax rate will discourage companies from keeping their headquarters and taxable income in the USA.

Is this sarcasm?

Sebastian Vettel

Nope. @realdonaldtrump is his private account

What nonsense. “The problem is that he very likely isn’t allowed to do that anymore” is absolutely false. This is a private account. He’s still a person, and a citizen. He has the same right to delete his own tweet as anyone else. Even in the unlikely event that the Court found that any public records statute covers…

“This new 49-year agreement thus represents a huge geopolitical gain for Russia’s strategy, as it has a foothold in another body of water.”

No surprise here, they’ve been there since the 1970's so . . .

The left’s foreign policy is stuck in the 80's, from the mouth of the former president himself.

Oh they can afford it, they just chose not to because they know they’ll get NATO protection either way. I think we should make NATO support contingent upon countries meeting their NATO obligations.

How can you honestly say that?

Obama gave Crimea to the Russians, flat out. He relinquished grip on the security of eastern europe, with that the slide began.

If NATO allies want protection, they can spend their own money doing it. They are only allies because we have been footing the bill. Poland on the other hand, has been ramping up its own military. I distinctly rememebr Obama saying we will not be the world police and we won’t be at the forefront of security for our…

I hope that if this President draws a red line and tells someone not to cross it, that he actually does something about it.

As this article seems to be largely an attempt at defending the past administrations policy and damning the one that started 1 hour ago, I will only point out that, even as such, it is poorly thought out. One can basically stop reading after this early sentence “His coordinated efforts with the European Union to…

<If Russian troops can enter Estonia or Poland, in theory, why not Germany as well?>

How do you link to Article 5 and still misrepresent what it actually says?

“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the…

It’s deplorable that Trump wants other countries to spend their cash on defense spending instead of leaning on the US to save them if attacked. It’s not like our govt is running up a yuuuuuge deficit and defense spending is not contributing biggly to the expansion of that. It’s time for other NATO countries to hit…

“this biker, who also appears to be moving a little quicker than the rest of traffic”

TL:DR?