Sorry, but this is a pet hate of mine:

I'm pretty sure that's a free to play game anyway though? So it's not really what you could call a deal.

Proofreading is four chumps.

I've been playing DotP 2013 for a while now, and I kind of want to get into the physical game, as in a week I'm moving to a city with a game shop and regular Magic nights. I enjoy DotP and I miss the feel of actual cards since being way into Pokemon cards as a kid.

Door?

I haven't handed him any money thus far. People who have get complete access to the game regardless of whether they pay again.

I have never seen this programme before, and it's incredibly obvious that this is not a news show. It's making fun of news. It's kind of funny how you're probably the only person taking it seriously.

Yo, this is Kotaku. We're all MRAs here. Jezebel is where the feminists hang out.

But what I'm saying is, why have unnecessary restraint when they can get more money? Money does not equate to a better game, yeah, but it does equate to more creative freedom — there are things you can do with a lot of money that you can't do without it.

Eh, fuck restraint. If they need, and can get, more money to make a game more in line with what they want, then they should go ahead and get more money. They aren't screwing anyone over, and I get a better game. Awesome.

I've always seen Kotaku as kind of a gaming tabloid anyway, as most of the Gawker sites are for their respective niches; you don't go to Gizmodo for technical analysis, and you don't go to Jezebel for serious feminist discourse. Gossip, rumour and a lack of objectivity are par for the course. I come to Kotaku because…

Oh, come on. Nine whole days extra for EU?

To be fair, making themselves a shit ton of money is probably pretty high on their priorities.

Well, no. But that isn't what you said. "They're cheap and disposable experiences, for the most part" is ridiculous. "If movies were reviewed as critically as many games are, few would be considered watchable" is ridiculous. To posit that games require "more skill to maintain one's attention" is ridiculous.

I'm sorry. It's just I have a hard time taking people who make ridiculous generalisations seriously.

I honestly don't quite get what you're saying. Like, games are better than films because they're longer?

...No.

...No.

Google, based on your searching history, deems lube and fecal matter to be more relevant to you than American politics.

HEY IN CASE YOU HAVEN'T HEARD IT'S POKEMON YO