You mean like the NFAC?

So... somebody who practically ran step by step through the checklist of what you’re supposed to do to in a situation before legally resorting to using lethal force to defend yourself is found innocent because the jury decided he was legally defending himself when he resorted to using lethal force.

Combine a snake and a duck into a dukake

Seems like there wouldn’t be a problem with tongues clipping through chins if they weren’t sticking their tongues out either.

1. NFT’s don’t do that in any way, shape, or form.

They have that. It’s called DRM.  People don’t seem to like it.

“Fundamentally, I hope people learn to understand what people are buying when purchasing NFT art right now is nothing more than directions on how to access or download an image,”

“Peaceful protest” will be a thing of the past- militias will have the right to mow down whoever they please, which they will do with glee in the coming shitstorm that is 2024.

I’m under the impression based on all the witness testimony and camera footage that he was literally running around putting out fires on the properties he was allegedly guarding. (Like, with an extinguisher putting out fires) immediately prior to Rosenbaum charging him. Which is a far cry from “walking around shooting…

He sent out a video clip depicting him violently killing one of his work colleagues

He’s gonna walk cause America. And large parts of America think a vigilante kid who drives to another town with a rifle is perfectly acceptable and is not provoking people.

I was actually thinking the defense could bring up the Proud Boys and acting under the color of war, not the prosecution.

AR-15's are (from quick google search) commonly used for hunting... so...

Then, especially given some of the other facts, how did this thing ever get to trial?

Make Rittenhouse go full MAGA and state he was acting under Proud Boy color of war

It may be hard for them to prove any sort of damage.

Maybe... Except that militia you are describing was literally just used by the colonies to overthrow their government... so it’s hard to think they didn’t have it in their minds that that may be needed again some time.

you’d have to state that he not only had the right to be there

situation wherein violence was more than likely inevitable.

In what world does crossing state lines with an illegally purchased firearm resulting in the shooting of three people NOT show clear intent?