*curtsies*
*curtsies*
sir, i'm gonna need you to step out of the vehicle.
glad to be of service *tips cap*
actually i can't recall anyone ever calling me racist before, but thanks for the lecture.
exactly.
you misunderstand me, please read my other comments and you'll find that i agree with where you're coming from 100%.
you complete me.
no the 'genitals' part is a bit ridiculous, i'll agree with you there.
those harmonies…chills.
That's really insulting to those session musicians and outside writers.
Exile On Main Street is a better album than Pet Sounds OR Sgt Pepper
my favorite, but not their best
'When I'm Sixty-Four' might actually be the only form of audio-based AIDS in existence.
lol, i'm talking about dorky Beatles fankids, not people who discuss them in a critical context like this. i would suggest a reading comprehension tutor, but you just established yourself that Reading Is Hard For You.
'Astral Weeks' is the best album of all time, anyway.
And holy shit, people that obsess over The Beatles are the worst, about as bad and strikingly limited/unoriginal as people that act as if New York is the only city in America.
There's nothing polite about 'Pet Sounds', though. Their fans were pissed. It was a huge risk at the time.
Haven't read the article yet, but the main difference between the two has always seemed simple to me:
Social media is one of the most powerful tools for dissemination of information that we have. Perhaps using that magical tool for discussing strategy to take down this fascist and corrupt system might be more useful than whining on and on about whether people should be 'allowed' to make burritos or not? or if men…
this man is history's greatest monster!