obtuseangle
ObtuseAngle
obtuseangle
Now playing

I feel like that this I am the only one obsessed with this particular track. It plays during one cutscene, and is surprisingly intense.

I will second you on that. Harry’s chemistry with Luna always seemed a lot higher to me than with Ginny, and they even went on a date together once (Slughorn’s Christmas party). Part of that may have been projection, however, as I may or may not have had a crush on Luna as a teenager

While I will not defend the vast majority of his filmography, Sandler is by all accounts a really nice dude in person.

Personally, I think the line is not treating a Chinese individual who had little to no control over said actions poorly simply because they are Chinese is the line.

Something that I have learned the hard way, when it comes to the internet, no matter how obvious you think the sarcasm is, people are going to miss it. Probably because no matter how ridiculous a parody statement you can come up with, someone out there will say something even dumber in earnest.

While I get your point, all of those actions were done decades and decades ago (mostly in the 40s or earlier, which is almost 80 years at this point) under an almost completely different governmental system (they adopted a new constitution in 1947). As far as I understand it, the Japanese Royal family is almost

Nah, that’s clearly legendary American safe cracker, Joe Bang.

The title was chosen long before Covid was a thing and now they’re stuck with it. It’s unfortunate, but I don’t really think that it’s fair to blame the executives. And I’m usually all for blaming executives for things.

Am I the only one who hates this movie? Not because it’s stupid, but because it’s stupid while being one of the most monotonous, boring, tedious movies that I’ve ever sat through. I honestly find Manos: The Hands of Fate more entertaining. Will Smith is the only thing that makes it remotely watchable to me.

If a President dies before an election, the VP carries out whatever remains of that President’s term. If that President was running for reelection and already received his party’s nomination, then things get a lot messier, as that has never happened.

I always loved that when you beat an area boss in a Kirby game, Kirby inexplicably multiplies and does a victory dance. It makes no sense, but it’s so adorable that I never cared.

I can somewhat get that, but it’s clear that Nintendo isn’t currently interested in filling this niche that clearly does exist, so what’s wrong with fans choosing to do so? There also doesn’t seem to be any content in this game that Nintendo would object to being accidentally associated with, unlike something like the

As long as Nintendo doesn’t try to make their own Fire Emblem board game, I don’t really think that it’s a problem. It isn’t going to cut into Nintendo’s bottom line unless they do.

The problem isn’t that WB’s statement is incorrect, it’s that it’s a strawman argument. No one was claiming that Rowling didn’t have the right to hold this view; they were claiming that the view is morally abhorrent, and (in some cases) that they will no longer financially support her. It’s a classic example of

You’re right that Rowling never came out and said those things. The problem is that the arguments Rowling used are often used to argue for oppressing and murdering trans people.

Am I the only one who just despises this book with a burning passion? I love Dr. Seuss in general, but this thing had no story, so it bored me to tears as a kid, and all of the inspirational messaging just makes me feel like a failure. It also has Seuss’s worst artwork in my opinion as I just hate the character

This basically is just the Birthday Dad movie from Bojack Horseman, but in real life.

The Lorax TV movie (not the Illuminations film) was pretty great too. It’s actually better than the book in some ways, as they added in a lot more nuance into its arguments.