Let’s be honest, there ARE mornings out there which would allow for this interpretation of “Good morning”.

This podcast didn’t have much to say.

This article is empty garbage and reeks of petty self-validation. But hey, that’s what’s on order these days; making a show of how expertly one can other the “opposing side”.

I wonder how performers feel when they realise they have work for the same reason I get a particular snackfood - because I had it that one time back when life wasn’t constantly resisting the urge to swallow a bullet

I’m stuck on the mobius strip of hating you for saying something so dumb and simultaneously hating myself for taking so seriously a comment that probably slipped out of you like a wouldn’t-be fart.

Nope

Yes but only because you liked something without consulting someone else. Be careful or you might come down with an original opinion.

I thought it was a fun movie that asks its audience to be able to take a joke... and maybe a godamn minute to think, before flinging ourselves up our own asses to collectively pilot the gurgling shit monster that is public outrage, megazord style, into stomping all over the movie until everyone is mad.

Actually I find it easier to talk to folks on the right about changing their minds that aren’t manslaughtering sacks of shit so instead of getting myself off with all the self validation and outrage of doing otherwise, doing as you’ve done in your comment, I’ll be off NOT considering all my right leaning friends and…

Aww Gizmodo is trying to do grown up journalism! I even see phrases like “condition of anonymity” and “sources allege”. Unsurprising garbage.

Shut up Dylan

That’s just a lazy way of thinking to avoid engaging humanity

Cool.

I was thinking I’d have to dig further than the first comment to see this shit. Silly me.

The “deal” is that people are vastly complex creatures and reducing anyone to their worst, especially at the expense of their best work, is a myopic way for anyone to live their life.

This article isn’t helpful

So leprechauns actually use rainbow portals and not rainbow roads and “...gold at the end of the rainbow...” like a road, is just a bad translation/missunderstanding for “...on the other side of the rainbow...” like a door?

This article is trash. Step it up.

Oh come on, you know, Derp? You Derp, I Derp; he, she me Derp! Derp, Derping - Derpology the study of Derp?

It’s a mistake to talk about moderation as “not good enough”. Moderation carries a monetary risk, the way most people think about it, ‘ban the bads’, so the result will be a sorting of assholes rather than suppression of them in order to keep their business. This will ultimately act as a financial incentive for…