No one is saying we can’t benefit from improving and correcting the impacts that cars have or will have in the future. Walker has a noted disdain for cars, so I believe this was a decent opposition to that trend that the OP is perfectly entitled to.
No one is saying we can’t benefit from improving and correcting the impacts that cars have or will have in the future. Walker has a noted disdain for cars, so I believe this was a decent opposition to that trend that the OP is perfectly entitled to.
I had that same feeling. You win this time, Walker!
Being familiar with her articles, I bet Walker herself would say she is, indeed, against cars. Walker has some good points about the impact of cars, but she drowns them out, for a lot of people, with unactionable fantasy-speak. My two cents.
I fully believe you can refrain from calling people names just because they don’t think like you; you’re better than that.
But yeah, the anti-car stuff is getting ridiculous.
Followed.
Hey, I can like a pillow for it’s mind! Joking aside though, if I were to buy a cuddle-pillow it’d have to be something weird or ironic like this, that’s just me; it’d be a conversation-pillow more than a cuddle-pillow haha
You need to get your pillow-priorities straight, sir.
Fascinating; any books or other literature, in particular, that you’d recommend if I wanted credible information about this stuff?
This could’ve been a more productive thread if not for the “Who are you to...” bit. I’m being genuine here, as someone who came to read about tech, I wish we could’ve have focused on the insight in the second half of your comment; much more interesting.
I respect Bill Gates as a person, and as an intellect. Seeing him have an opposing view to my own on this issue just belays the salient point that we are not doing ourselves any favors by trying to fit this Apple vs FBI situation inside of a tweet.
The only “villain” in this situation is dead; saying otherwise cripples the discussion with faux-simplicity. I don’t think anyone, that is worth listening to, is recoiling at the idea of the FBI masterminding an assault on privacy or encryption. The coolest heads are making the point that, big picture, the government…
Thanks for the comment, I learned something!
How is it that Sony products keep feeling more and more antiquated while still in development?
I’m thinking something like: GoPro sans the Red Bull aesthetic. It’d be great for journalism and research purposes; maybe child monitoring?
I see well made inflexible bezel/flexible screen hybrids being the first method of bringing this sort of thing to mass market, in order to accommodate batteries. I hope to see a near field wireless charging solution soon, though; that will really unlock the potential for lightweight screens.
It seems the end goal of the FBI is to feed this issue into a broken system, fully aware that the system is broken in their favor. A little fear, a little misinformation, a little fake patriotism, and set to boil for just long enough in the mass media; voila, faux-democracy, extra lamb hold the critical thinking.
Is it common for incestors to have hiding this sort of thing on lock? I never thought to look for this red flag before. Rachel seems perfectly reasonable, post-script.
I was ready to strike this off as a gimmick, going into the video; delightfully surprised to think the contrary.
Ideologies aside; this comment just wasn’t clever enough to contain the snark you were going for. No star for you.
Great! I’m excited to see the shift from development to application.