nyofarrell
nyofarrell
nyofarrell

She is there as a representative of the Lollipop Guild, I believe.

That protester is a class act compared to Sinema.

Imagine Oprah “We speak your names” and “I gift this mountain to you (Tom Cruise)Winfrey cringing at anything

Oh, FFS it was an obvious call-back to the classic line in the movie. Period.

Because the focus of such an article should be on the tragic absurdity of children who would have been kept from graduating because their parents’ couldn’t pay their lunch bills and not the person who ponied up the money, as laudable as that may be.

I suspect the writer is as skeptical of philanthropy as most progressives. She’s commenting on the way MrBeast’s (sic) shtick takes it to a grotesque, almost parodic level. Just like you wouldn’t need to save orphans from a machine in a world that values children, you wouldn’t need the Sacklers’ name on a museum in a

I’d say California is better off choosing from the ones who didn’t immediately cave to a bunch of lunatics and then had to be blackmailed into doing the bare minimum of the decent thing. Fuck Walgreens

I mean, the problem with that logic is that their supposed pro-choice stance was basically to say “I’m pro-choice” and then run away when the creeps showed up at the clinic. They didn’t even fight for a second before giving in; and yeah, I know they’re controlled by a corporate board that doesn’t give a shit either

“Our position has always been that, once we are certified by the FDA, Walgreens plans to dispense Mifepristone in any jurisdiction where it is legally permissible to do so, including the state of California,” a Walgreens representative told Politico. “Walgreens is facing the same circumstances as all retail

Good to hear a Democratic governor is finally willing to stand up. So far Walgreens stock is down $3 from Newsom’s announcement. Once the more lucrative employee and large Medicare/ Medicaid contracts come up, the price will be driven lower. 

The GOP just showed they were willing to sever their ties with fucking Disney for their (im)moral “purity” crusade. If they are willing to turn on The Mouse, then other corporations have gotta be wondering what these mad dogs will do next if they don’t get their way. We’re all just trying to ride out the tide of crazy

this kind of thinking is what would be the foundation of literal revolution in terms of how people think about their bodies--whatever their body composition. I applaud you and support you and if I was in your “circle” I would be cheering for you every step of this mental process. 

I really feel we’re in the dark days of obesity medicine. I’m obese. I have been since I was four years old. I put myself on my first diet: I was 7. I was in a medically supervised weight management program at 11. Weight Watchers at 14. Atkins at 15. I have never known a conscious moment in which food and my body were

Weighing in as an MD and the spouse of an MD, but not an Arkansas resident . . . a D&C is a procedure to clear a uterus. You can use a D&C to clear a uterus that has recently delivered a live baby, which is very clearly not an abortion. Suffice it to say, D&C does not necessarily equal abortion.

I know this gets

As a spouse to an Ob/Gyn, you don’t perform a D&C unless there is zero fetal heart rate. So the story here doesn’t line up with either narrative (the article’s nor the Duggar’s). The reality is that Duggar’s fetus had already died - she, for whatever reason, just couldn’t use those words. And yes, while the

She and Adele have the same makeup artist.

People complaining about how “there’s less in thrift stores now!” as if it’s this woman’s fault and not the fault of an industry making less durable clothes and a shit economy that’s pushed more people to buy second hand.

Some have even gone as far as to call her a “mini landlord” (more on that later)

There’s a beautiful symmetry that this women finds cloths in other people’s stores to sell, and the meat of this article is summarizing someone else’s analysis of why that’s ok. Jezebel is like a reseller of thrift-store hot-takes.

I mean, none of that sounds uncommon for what happens to shared property in a divorce. If the genders were reversed, we wouldn’t see any problem with a lesser-earning woman making a claim for all or part of a marital asset like the house. The law pretty much says that it doesn’t matter if one spouse makes the money