This is so not difficult to have sex in. Just drop the panties, leave everything else in place, and go cowgirl.

So what's your very smart plan for sex at the woman's place? I mean, aren't you even more at risk of a false accusation there, as she could say that you forcibly entered her home? Or does that never happen because it's too risky for your reputation?

In general, if you have to lie to someone to have sex, then maybe you shouldn't be having sex with them.

You think you would look smart if people knew you were taping sexual encounters. You are very secure that this is a good idea. Then what's the problem with telling your partners that they will be recorded? If it's such a good idea, no reasonable woman would object to your conditions, surely. And you'd be in the clear,…

Oh, I think it's pretty clear who actually has the serious issues...

And you're just going to ignore the ginormous tins of caviar right next to the cheese hamper?

But IT DID NOT MAKE IT INTO CASE LAW. It was thrown out. That's what everyone keeps trying to point out to you. If it made it into case law, that would indeed suck. But it did not, because the system worked.

Babeland already started the tie-ins when the books came out. Comically goofy and seemingly inconsistent with their positive vibe, at least it was a tie-in that made sense with both the book and their product line.

Smith used to have sororities long ago, but they were all shut down by the college, which no longer allows Greek social organizations.

I just have one question. Not to be dismissive of the larger issue at all, which has already been discussed at length and to which I have nothing new to add. But I'm curious — what does wedding attire "that the groom would wear" look like? At every wedding I've been to, formal or no, the groom and his groomsmen were…

The Comic-Con eye looking up her skirt is creepier than Edward.