I HATE(!!!) when they throw idols back into the game so late. I'm glad it ultimately didn't ruin everything.
I HATE(!!!) when they throw idols back into the game so late. I'm glad it ultimately didn't ruin everything.
To be fair, a woman literally won last season. But I see your point about the quality of her competition. That said, I think it's much easier for a woman to win than for someone like Ken, whose game was more physical than strategic. I don't think we'll be seeing any winners like him any time soon, unless the male in…
Exactly. I know FTC lasts hours, and they edit it down to the ten minutes we see. But I can't imagine that, at any point of that FTC, Hannah provided any sort of argument that could have gotten me to believe she was the one responsible for putting the jurors on the jury. Sure, she had a hand in it, but in no way was…
Oh, and one other thing.
Jeff doesn't really ask the "If [x] had been different, how would you have voted?" questions anymore, although I wish he would.
They were stuck in a lose-lose situation once they didn't get rid of David at Final 5. Because Final 4 left them with no real options. No matter who they voted out, the person who stayed would have won. The move would have been to get rid of David at 5 and then Adam at 4.
Agreed. I think this is one of the sloppiest games to win in a while, with haphazard play all over the place in the mid stages. Even at FTC, I didn't think his performance was as strong as it could have been. The editors deserve tons of credit for making that seem like a vote that could have gone in any direction.
"I told her I won."
I'm in the same boat. I feel like a lot of people are dismissing the "this show sucks" commenters as trolls or people who'll never be satisfied. And while I would imagine that's certainly true for some of those commenters, my angst comes from a place of wanting to like the show more than I do. When TWD is good, it's…
A solid argument.
Which is crazy to me. If you have the option of making a good show, why the hell would you choose to make a bad one instead?
It just occurred to me that Carol (and Morgan, for that matter) still has no idea what happened to Glenn and Abraham.
There is literally not one single argument any person can make to me for why Fear The Walking Dead shouldn't have been an anthology series focusing on the outbreak in different places in the world each season.
For a network with "American" in its name, they really love outsourcing Southern roles to Brits.
At least have Quarrel be the one to take the shot and miss.
Now that the group is all back together (sans Morgan and Carol), we should probably start a betting pool to see how many episodes into the spring season it'll take for them to all be separated again, and we're right back to single-character/story episodes.
If anything, the big thing I felt this episode lacked, which I really wanted, was a scene of Rick flipping a nuclear dick on Carl once he found out he stowed away to Negan's and nearly got himself killed. Maybe if father and son had a blowout, it could have helped explain why Rick felt that living under the yoke of…
Meanwhile, thrill to scenes of Carol avoiding the plotline while characters inexplicably gravitate to her. Richard's army to defeat the Saviors must start with a woman in her 50s who lives alone who he believes to have no combat experience and who Ezekiel.
It's been so long, I had no idea who that even was.
AMC's desperation to have TWD running year-round, now that they're doing the same strategy in TWD off-season with FTWD, is going to kill the cash cow much quicker.