Well that’s the take of someone who’s apparently never been inside a Walmart.

If you were just able to afford buying two pairs of ModCloth shoes, then ... yeah. Kind of.

Okay, then you’re just being deliberately obtuse. That’s actually worse.

Seriously. What’s so hard to understand about context? If I’m talking about John, and their job/pet/whatever, it should be understand that ‘their’ in this context refers to John. People just like to be deliberately difficult.

It really doesn’t ...

It’s actually not that hard if you have a good grip on the English language. Words and language are fluid; the earlier you understand that, the better off you’re gonna be.

Yes. The only flats I wear are the LES, and I wear them until they fall apart (which even then takes a long time, and considering I wear them year-round in all sorts of weather, is saying something). Christian Siriano’s line is pretty good, too.

But why would you ‘take away that state’? They’re citizens, they count, and there’s no merit to saying ‘hurr hurr, what if CA didn’t exist’? The fact it, the American people proved quite obviously that they wanted Hillary. We got screwed by (among other things) an outdated system that in no way represents a true…

yeah. don’t worry, it’s no picnic for us today, either.

wow, the arrogance it must take to think you’re entitled to details of someone’s personal life ...

How about just identifying the users who view such content? Does that seem like it’d be ‘hard’ for them?

I don’t know that winning the popular vote by almost 3 million votes constitutes ‘[getting] her ass kicked,’ but I guess basic math is subject to revision by ‘alternative facts’ in Trump’s America?

lol, you sound like a barrel of laughs

sorry, how is that proof?

most likely because the pronunciations are more similar.

use a funnel and a tube.

thank you. of course bigotry exists everywhere, but let’s not pretend that if we made a list of the homophobic/misogynistic/racist/transphobic/etc bills, etc, that the south wouldn’t be highly disproportionately represented. let’s not kid ourselves.

right, but if it were filled with garland, we’d have less to worry about, considering RBG is getting up there in years. people are worried that he’ll get gorsuch AND then another vacancy to fill in the next few years. not sure what’s hard to understand about that.

yeah, I don’t necessarily know if I want her to run again, but experience is a good thing, especially in matters as crucial as these, and I don’t know why it’s treated as a drawback. change for the sake of change frequently brings, at the best, missteps and mistakes, and at worst, chaos.

so — it was proposed to be included, and then erased.