We will not have that kind of inconvenient questioning here please and thank you.

“That Weinstein was not charged with predatory sexual assault perhaps indicates that the jury did not believe her testimony, but Sciorra says the experience of testifying was “painful but necessary.”

“Academically trained, Vorona Cote’s Too Much is a meticulous close-reading of texts from the Brontë sisters to Jane Eyre’s madwoman Bertha Mason to Christina Rossetti’s poem “Goblin Market” to the works of theorist Michel Foucault, whose ideas she renders accessible”

You probably could, but most people don’t drive enough measured either by distance or time to make the ad exposure worth very much.

The best part of that was that it can be applied to any group anyone doesn’t like with the same degree of accuracy and truthfulness.

I’m not sure why people “love” any corporation or service, but I do understand why people like Hulu.

“Silence is just as culpable to hateful acts as the instigator.”

“ it’s a convenient self-absolution for white people who genuinely want to believe that centuries of systemic oppression and racism have left them singularly untouched and without a racist bone in their bodies.”

“Donald Trump Jr., is a sniveling little daddy’s boy with greasy hair and a remarkably perplexing body composition that reminds me of a Stretch Armstrong doll that has been left in the sun for an entire summer.”

Excuse me but SARS gave us an incredible concert ( google SARS-stock if you don’t recall ).

“I do believe that it’s the f̶i̶r̶s̶t̶ second time in history that fire has ever melted steel” - Rosie O’Donnell

If you’re interested you can find a lot of revenue comparisons — nearly all of them in press releases advocating for one side or the other.

The “arguments” are only “arguments” ( with scare quotes ) if you take the article as representing the actual arguments.

It is really interesting to see the actual argument ( although a bit tedious to wade through ). It would have been great reporting to accurately represent it here.

Another appropriate inquiry is the contract they were playing under and the fact that the agreements were structured differently **and agreed upon** by the respective players’ associations.

Any kind of honest reporting would have included this ( the actual filing):

“Biologically speaking, it doesn’t, because men are men and women are women of course.”

Er, that was pretty well stated and contained sound reasoning. Are you sure you posted it in the correct place?

Sanders wants to raze capitalism, but do you think he’d sell any of his houses?

“we don’t have to insult because we can just state facts and call him out to his face, which no one ever really does.”