“happily destroying any remaining pretense that we live in a democracy”

There must be a word for an occasion where you try snark, sit back smugly to feel superior and bask in the glow of the echo chamber, and then realize that paying for apple products wasn’t anywhere near the topic of the article.

Ask a pregnant woman what she’s carrying - she’ll say a baby - and then go on your rant.

Kind of - redlining was kind of a proxy for government inducement to making riskier loans ( according to Bloomberg ). There’s no indication that he thought banks “weren’t racist enough.”

Probably not the way I’d go, but it’s not unreasonable and far from dumb.

Choosing Bloomberg over Trump is choosing Dasani over Aquafina. Same product different team. The only question is which advertising scheme you respond to more strongly.

I have the same question. Serves us right for expecting reporting and journalism here.

They won’t, but they will be displacing someone else who would - given traditional scientific definitions - otherwise be participating.

There is nothing in their statement indicating that they are fearful of anyone “swinging a penis” - justifiably or irrationally.

+1 for recognizing that these are complex issues.

+1 for updating

When you look for a reason for somebody to be a victim one will find one.

When you look for a reason for somebody to be a victim one will find one.

Really we should all just get to pick one major purchase we willingly agreed to pay for and just not have to pay for it.

This time we’ve got a frontrunner with a slim lead (Bernie)

Bernie is inauthentic.

Who a candidate would choose as their potential VP is relevant.

Also “not going to win the nomination”

“Bernie Sanders has won the New Hampshire primary, earning about 4,000 more votes than second place candidate Pete Buttigieg.”