Looking for information at a place purporting to provide information and then pointing out that it’s patently - and perhaps intentionally - incorrect information seems to be a good threshold for articulating a complaint, no?

Note: She may not be lying - that requires that she knows she’s wrong.  She may just be a terrible journalist.

I realize that you can’t correct a post after 15 minutes - but you could follow-up after ( surely ) you’ve seen that the player’s association has commented a - fact either ignored by the author or, if not known due to poor investigative journalism, not corrected as of this posting.

It might be ... if it were true.

.... during that very specific window of time.

Also a cherry-picked window of time.

How dare you drop the name of a a well meaning actor into that list!

Should you protect the principal is only a useful question after you define which principal “the” principal is.

.... and... on the wrong article.

Any 1st grade rec league random game in a season - 24 goals in one game

Describes every player/team

Who lost their career?  

Made up position doesn’t make sense - I’d rather he take a position I didn’t just make up?

The lost the election for Clinton.

“Well, I think we are running against a lot of problems. I think that there are certain number of people who would like to see a woman elected, and I understand that,”

What you said and what he said:

In the battle of Stretch Armstrong v. Stretch Strawman.....

Internet pass revoked.  That kind of thinking will not be tolerated.  In fact thinking itself is on the bubble.

<bouncing around wildly as deadline approaches>

Unless you believe that no assaults are done by strangers your argument ( and attendant stereotyping of conservative beliefs ) doesn’t work.