Ugly UI, proprietary conector... and worse of all SAMSUNG software on it.

@Elliot Lee: I doubt videocalling will be ever common in any form. Because it sucks.

Does it came with built in strobes, dark lights and lasers?

@SmarchHare: Yeah and if you fits on it you can visit parallel universes.

@aririn: Better yet, after the launch you can buy a DSi with a big save.

@Samuel James Reha: Only if you open Gizmodo in a Nintendo 3ds.

@bobbobato: Do you really know someone who used the cellphone´s front facing camera for something more than try if it works?

@avmaldo: It makes totally sense for me... and I´m affraid I don´t have enough knowledge to confirm or not.

Hummm... I see some hands here who would get some advantage of it.

Am I the only one who thinks videochat isn´t standard today just because people don´t want to be seen most part of the time?

Well... the voice commanded Home Cinema would be surelly a problem with the own kinetic ads...

@avmaldo: Not really... because the difference between the lens and the sensor is allways the same, so it doesn´t really matter.

@CommentingpointlesslyisMeh: Yes... but when you buy a cellphone you expect it to works well out of the box.

@avmaldo: The camera actually measure the distance to focus.

@Lars Wenngren: Isn´t a new tech at all... your electric toothbrush probably use the same tech from years...

@BlackMarketArts: Did you see the Samsung´s skins?

Ok, considering my experience with Samsung Galaxy*:

Hey, bush was right!!!

Can anyone explain the difference between "20/20 visual acuity" and "Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem" and why one needing the double of resolution than the other one to match the human eye?

Ahhh no lasers? Quantum computing just lost half of it's charm.