Although I am not too surprised that Deadspin would lead with that quote, this is not nearly the article that I expected here. I would offer that this statement:

Oh. Yeah. That.

So Kevin, will you be updating the story to include the response from FSU's President? Or will you choose not to include it since it does not fit in with your recent practice of only "reporting" negative news about FSU Football?

What are you on about here Adam? The letter from Thrasher directly calls out the NYT. The opening paragraph (emphasis mine):

New economies to equip you with upgrade materials

I may or may not have quite literally squealed a little when I saw this headline. I guess I can no longer put off buying a flight stick of some sort. I played hours of X-Wing, but sadly never got to play TIE Fighter. This will be remedied in short order.

Call the question. It's a criminal-level oversight.

It helps that Rudolf is a true 9.

That's actually a really good idea that you should submit via Feedback.

If you're over 21, it is. If you aren't, it's above the legal limit.

The police report had her BAC at .04. As I am sure you know, that is half the legal limit to drive. So yes, quite a few people, including the incident report, dispute that she was intoxicated.

Funny how internet discussions can, every once in a while, be civil. I actually agree with this entire post (absent the part at the end, obviously). We don't, and likely won't ever, know exactly what happened in that room. I am not one of the FSU fans who felt that this was in any way pre-meditated or some sort of…

Well, that clarifies your position quite nicely. I would offer that the answer to both of those questions would be quite compelling with regard to the overall case. You, however, can't be bothered to consider the possible answers, which likewise makes me VERY comfortable in my point of view... which is that you have…

I would agree that the sloppiness of the TPD investigation is just as detrimental to Winston's case (assuming he is innocent) than it is to the Prosecution's.

Two questions for you:

Or, through a careful consideration of all of the evidence that has been publicly presented I perhaps have come to a different conclusion than you have? Even considering the "favorite son" status of Winston? You don't know me, nor can you have a grasp of how I feel about the complexity of the situation, yet you feel…

Nice link to a hack piece that brought zero new info to the discussion. Honestly, the slipshod investigation into the event did just as much harm to Winston (assuming, as I will freely admit that I do) then it did to a case for the prosecution.

Ah, so you bought one attorney's version of the events but not the other's. How, may I ask, were you able to so quickly ascertain which one was telling the truth and which was full of shit? What evidence informed your decision?

Yep, exactly the same situation. On the one hand, you have years of crimes being committed against children, with at a minimum the knowledge of (and ignoring by) members of the university administration.

Actually, he has only apologized twice. Once for the crab legs and once for the (non-event) of yelling something profane. If he was ANYONE else in the country that would have been a non-story, and you and I both know it. Steals repeatedly? One time. Once. And he was never even arrested for it.