That’s not what infer means.

Then I’d say you found a gaudy purple and yellow unicorn. They probably even let you make a moderate amount of noise. You should count yourself lucky.

Do they have free weights and allow you to deadlift and squat? Do they have a squat rack or just smith machines?

Well, this article wasn’t about Planet Fitness, because it specifically mentioned being in a gym. PF isn’t a gym.

There was actually a whole tv show based on this premise. The common factor seems to be already carrying a lot of extra weight.

I’m not sure I’ve every seen it called an American History X rather than a curb-stomp

That would depend on the kind of truck. Also, I’m not sure what you mean about driving under the influence. You can’t, but that wasn’t a part of this case.

Got a Rebel Salty Black Bear here!

Well, he’s not forcing them to stay. He just lied to (the younger ones) about the investigation to get them there, and they’d just have to sacrifice a year of eligibility to leave, and he might get to nix their transfer request if he doesn’t like the school they choose to transfer to. But yeah, no one is *forcing*…

It’s all I think of every time I see it. It blows my mind that they don’t use Atomic in the trailers.

That is a high-quality hot take.

No

1. “That is the most lazy excuse and increasingly common defense for leftist suppression of speech—the idea that the First Amendment is some narrow technicality that is to be worked around whenever possible.”

Which is a valuable conversation to have, but

Yeah, and I reiterated that. A non-state actor can shut your speech down any time they want. Free speech exists as a concept outside the first amendment, but there aren’t any protections outside the first amendment.

Nope, sorry. The first amendment doesn’t apply. The idea of free speech exists outside the first amendment, but it only exists legally inside the first amendment. If there’s no state actor it’s not censorship, it’s just the free market.

No state actor, no free speech.

The majority of those in the country crossed illegally, but the majority of the ones that entered the country over the past ten years (according to the study) overstayed. That’s what I was trying to point out. Beyond that, the population of illegal immigrants has decreased. It’s only a recent change if you count 2007…

FTA: Overstays have exceeded those entering illegally every year since 2007, and there have been half a million more overstays than illegal entries since 2007.

Talk amongst yourselves; I’m a little verklempt