norvface
Norv Face
norvface

+1

Ha!

+1

+1

Wow. +1

What a complete load of B.S. Paterno showed many times throughout his career that he did not bow to outside pressure. He was the only person I've ever heard of who was asked to resign (in the early-mid 2000s when the program was down), refused, and still kept his job. If you're not going to listen to the people who

+1

It's all a misunderstanding caused by Mr. Rahim's poor English skills. He misspelled "Randy Lerner" as "Lebron James".

It wouldn't have to normally, that's why I said I'd give him a pass for almost anyone else - but this is a band whose political views define their aesthetic. Maybe I should draw a better analogy and say this is like Vladimir Putin claiming that Pussy Riot is his favorite band.

I could give him a pass if he named almost any artist other than a band whose very name implies they're against everything he stands for, since he by definition is part of the "machine". While most artists are indeed liberal, it's hard to think of many that are as blatant about it in their music as RATM. This would be

[dying]

I got 58 as well. Got Dilfer and Flutie, but missed the others you mentioned.

Um, what? "Imagine" was a Lennon solo song, not a Beatles song.

Or showed them live on the East Coast but delayed them three hours on the West Coast (like they did with the 4x100 freestyle relay in Beijing)?

Absolutely, it would be nice. However, I can't blame society for that conditioning, I can only blame the predators who have given (most of) us guys a bad rap. And that's the point I think a lot of these responses are missing - yes, it sucks to be thought of as a potential predator when you have no bad intentions at

Can't claim credit - there's a blog post that has been linked here several times entitled "Schröedinger's Rapist" that did a wonderful job of explaining how women feel when a strange man approaches them, and how to correctly interpret signals and respect a woman's right to safety and privacy. Very eye-opening.

Nigeria: 18 mentions, 0 medals

As the father of a young (3 1/2 y.o.) daughter, I applaud this policy. It's a case of Schröedinger's molester here. I'm sure I would feel differently if I were affected by this policy, say I was on a business trip and was told to switch seats if I had nothing to do with the seat assignment in the first place - but I

+1, sir. I only have one question.

Really? Couldn't make it to the second sentence where they point out that it's anonymous unless the coach reveals his vote, or the second blockquote where USA Today points out that only the final regular season vote is typically made public?