I take no sides in any of it, I think they're both ridiculous. Not like some A or B system can represent my personal ethics. Seems weird to me how everyone is so cookie cutter.

Seriously. That browser made me think I went to http://yzzerdd.com/. meatwad make the money, see.

I think that may be your mom reminiscing fondly. Those things had some fine plasticy hair that when you burnt it on the stove, it smelled bad and made your sister cry

Isn't that all they care about anyway? Safety my ass, they need someone to pay their salaries and buy tanks.

Porn stars who divorce their husband then he releases private videos is the same thing. Porn stars are people as well. You haven't thought about this much. It's in the context of revenge porn.

Way to extrapolate with the logic of a 3-year-old. I'm saying it's obvious there is no consent after that point.

Yeah, it is very good. It's funny. I always forget to use last.fm's radio. I think I've scrobbled most every song for the past 8 years and somehow only remember to use it when setting up a different music service. Good call. I have used it a few times, and it's been pretty good and never made me listen to shit already…

Yeah, that's how I use it as well, or my intent when using it, anyway.. I rarely find anything with Spotify for that very reason. It plays my stuff or a couple of artists/songs over and over. It's been a bad experience. I miss Pandora sometimes, but I don't miss limited skips.

In my experience with that feature I get the same song over and over and over, or in lieu of that stuff from the same album/artist over and over and over. It's not very good, at least compared to something like Pandora. If they did better with that feature I'd be very happy.

How is their catalog compared to Spotify et.al.? If I just wanted to listen to my own stuff I have several trillion ways to do that. It's the catalog that matters to me.

This is why every couple should be forced to end relationship on Facebook to establish a timeline! /s (but that would be a pretty good indicator of what is or isn't consented to.)

I think the main thing that needs to be drilled into the heads of these vindictive, malicious asshats is that distributing sexual images of someone to hurt them or for whatever sick reason is in the same ballpark as kiddie porn or setting up a camera in their whore mother's bedroom. You are exploiting people without…

Obama sucks. I was mocking the Fox commentariat not praising Obama. See how there's no praise in it? That was a dead giveaway. ;D

Why is presumably why most states hit the car owner instead. There's no real reason you should get to break the law and get away with it just because it wasn't your car, or it was your friend driving.

I think it's horrible/hilarious these things are so secretive. It's like the company that makes and sells them knows damn fucking well that its unconstitutional, and so do all the agencies who use them, but if they never say what they do or how they're used, it's legal... draconian shit.

If you had read, you'd see that I said twice already that it should be fixed. The only reasonable conclusion is that you are a fanboi. There isn't much to assume, given that you seem to be literate.

it's weird how you're still intelligible with that oddly-banana shaped Apple in your mouth.

yeah. it needs to be fixed... but I love seeing the big guy who does the same bullshit get his just desserts.

You lost me at James van der Beek. He's alive? Shitshitshit...gotta pay back my Dawson's Creek death pool.

I'm with you, but after apple rounded edge rectangled samsung, they can suck a dick. The system is broken, but Apple deserved it.