I actually haven’t dug into it yet, but I thought it was a great hybrid.

Absolutely, I agree to an extent. The problem now is that I typically opt for going straight to research and skipping the film entirely once. The films existence is enough to get me digging,

It’s gotten to the point I don’t even enjoy “based on the true story” movies anymore. So many of these films take far too much creative license. You go to wikipedia after the film and discover that critical elements of the stories were fictional. What’s the point of a film like this except for people to talk about it…

Yeah, I had only recently discovered them when he died. It was such a bummer.

Mark Sandman of Morphine died of a heart attack during a show. 

Chase did tons of funny stuff after 1983, Fletch came out in 1985. Was he misquoted? Did he mean 1993?

Why the fuck does anyone ever voluntarily go into a cave?

He’s a Sherlock Holmes superfan. Mycroft Holmes was just OK (compared to Doyle) but as a fan of the show, I am excited that he’s involved.

“Batman takes off his costume...”

It depends on whose side you are applying the philosophy to: the owner, or the consumer?

And his editor was just running with it, apparently.

“Lost was never designed to provide people with answers”

Or any film that rests it’s entire premise on the revelation in it’s denouement.

I on the other hand, make $1 per hour. Tequila helps.

“There are 25 guys who can play that part...and second place gets a set of steak knives.” 

Yep, been doing this for years.

Even worse: There are two receipts. It would be easy to fill one out for praise on social media and then give the server the “real” one.

Why does he say Mike Tyson as if it is japanese words?

Trump got runover by a bus? Why isn’t this getting more coverage?

I am a huge Dario Argento fan and have followed Asia’s career from it’s creepy beginnings as a bid for daddy’s attention. IMO she has never been likable; tragic and flawed and sad, but not very likable.