noalwaysmeansno
NoAlwaysMeansNo
noalwaysmeansno

I know but they introduced her in such an awesome way after foreshadowing her for a long time before. I hate when shows bring in New characters outta nowhere but Buffy did it right. Implanting her into everyone’s memory as if she was really buffys sister. She was just the key in human form. Sorry, geeking out here.

Yeah, but I hear the bears aren’t very well trained there.

Good fucking gravy.

“open sexual solicitation” would be fine if the inherent power structure in society and especially in college was anywhere close to equal. If women who choose to enjoy sex, could do so without being dragged through the mud and called any number of horrific names when they are victims of sexual assault, then yes “open

1. I’m a guy. I still understand sexism, and am always willing to learn more.

1. You lecture “everybody here” about how they should treat poor delicate men who just don’t know any better and #notallmen but make all kinds of generalizations about posters here, and 2) you’re kind of a douche, sunshine.

Well first of all, we get a lot of trolls around here. Which is why I went on and answered your question anyway, and tried to do so respectfully, in case you were being genuine. If your feelings are hurt because of that, sorry but it wasn’t meant as an insult.

Can’t tell if trolling, but....

You can do this as a customer?
I have never thought to do this. But after reading your comment, I think I will start to make a fuss. Now instead of being sad when I see a rude customer causing problems, I can stand up for the waiter or clerk. This will be fun!

Wait, they initially claimed that no frat brothers were involved? What did they suspect, a roving pack of satyrs?

Honestly. The wife works from home 3 days a week and the nanny is probably there while she works at home, like my son is at daycare 5 days a week while I work outside the home. That’s not a luxury: they probably pay much less those of us with full-time daycare do. And someone having who comes in an hour or two twice a

This. That kind of reasoning is simultaneously grossly insulting to men and completely lets them off the hook for bad behavior. The world is filled with men who aren’t disgusting rapey assholes. Being a misogynistic douchebag isn’t a symptom of being male; it’s a symptom of being a misogynistic douchebag.

That doesn’t count, becuase anger is only an emotion when women do it. When a Man is angry, it’s not an emotion, it’s an expression of his primal man-power. When women do it, it’s a sobby, bitchy, emotion.

i always thought men were so restrained when it came to giving their opinions. thank god for steve harvey—finally some male centered media!

believes in such archaic ideas about the difference between the sexes that there are practically cobwebs dripping off his words.

At some point, as a woman being asked those questions, answering by making fart noises become COMPLETELY OKAY, right?

Oh, I get that entirely as well. It just seems like an illogical reading of the amendment, as if they’re entirely disregarding the entire first clause, and being inconsistent on the final one.

I don’t want to start a “religious war” here, but the constitution places that right into the context of a “well regulated militia”. Regulation (such as licensing) should be fine. It’s explicitly there in the amendment.

Hatroits. I can honestly say I've never heard that one. It fits perfectly. The Christian Taliban Hatriots. It works on so many levels.